Re: [PATCH v29 23/32] x86/cet/shstk: Add user-mode shadow stack support
From: Yu, Yu-cheng <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-27 18:10:45
Also in:
linux-api, linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml
From: Yu, Yu-cheng <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-27 18:10:45
Also in:
linux-api, linux-arch, linux-mm, lkml
On 8/26/2021 9:25 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 11:11:52AM -0700, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
[...]
quoted
+ +int shstk_setup(void) +{ + struct thread_shstk *shstk = ¤t->thread.shstk; + unsigned long addr, size; + int err; + + if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK)) + return 0; + + size = round_up(min_t(unsigned long long, rlimit(RLIMIT_STACK), SZ_4G), PAGE_SIZE); + addr = alloc_shstk(size); + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr)) + return PTR_ERR((void *)addr); + + start_update_msrs();You're setting CET_U with the MSR writes below. Why do you need to do XRSTOR here? To zero out PL[012]_SSP? If so, you can WRMSR those too - no need for a full XRSTOR...
Because on context switches the whole xstates are switched together, we need to make sure all are in registers.
quoted
+ err = wrmsrl_safe(MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP, addr + size); + if (!err) + wrmsrl_safe(MSR_IA32_U_CET, CET_SHSTK_EN); + end_update_msrs(); + + if (!err) { + shstk->base = addr; + shstk->size = size; + } + + return err; +}