[PATCH v2 29/29] docs: x86: avoid using ReST :doc:`foo` markup
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-06-16 06:28:51
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
documentation, the rest · Maintainers:
Jonathan Corbet, Linus Torvalds
The :doc:`foo` tag is auto-generated via automarkup.py. So, use the filename at the sources, instead of :doc:`foo`. Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> --- Documentation/x86/boot.rst | 4 ++-- Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/x86/boot.rst b/Documentation/x86/boot.rst
index fc844913dece..894a19897005 100644
--- a/Documentation/x86/boot.rst
+++ b/Documentation/x86/boot.rst@@ -1343,7 +1343,7 @@ follow:: In addition to read/modify/write the setup header of the struct boot_params as that of 16-bit boot protocol, the boot loader should also fill the additional fields of the struct boot_params as -described in chapter :doc:`zero-page`. +described in chapter Documentation/x86/zero-page.rst. After setting up the struct boot_params, the boot loader can load the 32/64-bit kernel in the same way as that of 16-bit boot protocol.
@@ -1379,7 +1379,7 @@ can be calculated as follows:: In addition to read/modify/write the setup header of the struct boot_params as that of 16-bit boot protocol, the boot loader should also fill the additional fields of the struct boot_params as described -in chapter :doc:`zero-page`. +in chapter Documentation/x86/zero-page.rst. After setting up the struct boot_params, the boot loader can load 64-bit kernel in the same way as that of 16-bit boot protocol, but
diff --git a/Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst b/Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst
index c5b695d75349..9f0b1851771a 100644
--- a/Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst
+++ b/Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ are aligned with platform MTRR setup. If MTRRs are only set up by the platform firmware code though and the OS does not make any specific MTRR mapping requests mtrr_type_lookup() should always return MTRR_TYPE_INVALID. -For details refer to :doc:`pat`. +For details refer to Documentation/x86/pat.rst. .. tip:: On Intel P6 family processors (Pentium Pro, Pentium II and later)
--
2.31.1