Thread (40 messages) 40 messages, 7 authors, 2021-06-07

Re: [PATCH v9 07/10] mm: Device exclusive memory access

From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Date: 2021-05-28 13:11:34
Also in: dri-devel, linux-mm, lkml, nouveau

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 11:48:40AM +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:

[...]
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
+     while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) {
+             /* Unexpected PMD-mapped THP? */
+             VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!pvmw.pte, page);
+
+             if (!pte_present(*pvmw.pte)) {
+                     ret = false;
+                     page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
+                     break;
+             }
+
+             subpage = page - page_to_pfn(page) + pte_pfn(*pvmw.pte);
I see that all pages passed in should be done after FOLL_SPLIT_PMD, so
is
this needed?  Or say, should subpage==page always be true?
Not always, in the case of a thp there are small ptes which will get
device
exclusive entries.
FOLL_SPLIT_PMD will first split the huge thp into smaller pages, then do
follow_page_pte() on them (in follow_pmd_mask):

        if (flags & FOLL_SPLIT_PMD) {
                int ret;
                page = pmd_page(*pmd);
                if (is_huge_zero_page(page)) {
                        spin_unlock(ptl);
                        ret = 0;
                        split_huge_pmd(vma, pmd, address);
                        if (pmd_trans_unstable(pmd))
                                ret = -EBUSY;
                } else {
                        spin_unlock(ptl);
                        split_huge_pmd(vma, pmd, address);
                        ret = pte_alloc(mm, pmd) ? -ENOMEM : 0;
                }

                return ret ? ERR_PTR(ret) :
                        follow_page_pte(vma, address, pmd, flags,
&ctx->pgmap); }

So I thought all pages are small pages?
The page will remain as a transparent huge page though (at least as I 
understand things). FOLL_SPLIT_PMD turns it into a pte mapped thp by splitting 
the pmd and creating pte's mapping the subpages but doesn't split the page 
itself. For comparison FOLL_SPLIT (which has been removed in v5.13 due to lack 
of use) is what would be used to split the page in the above GUP code by 
calling split_huge_page() rather than split_huge_pmd().
But shouldn't FOLL_SPLIT_PMD filled in small pfns for each pte?  See
__split_huge_pmd_locked():

	for (i = 0, addr = haddr; i < HPAGE_PMD_NR; i++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
                ...
		} else {
			entry = mk_pte(page + i, READ_ONCE(vma->vm_page_prot));
                        ...
		}
                ...
		set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte, entry);
        }

Then iiuc the coming follow_page_pte() will directly fetch the small pages?

-- 
Peter Xu
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help