Re: [PATCH v9 03/10] mm/rmap: Split try_to_munlock from try_to_unmap
From: Shakeel Butt <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-25 23:45:49
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-mm, lkml, nouveau
From: Shakeel Butt <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-25 23:45:49
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-mm, lkml, nouveau
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:40 AM Liam Howlett [off-list ref] wrote:
[...]
quoted
+/* + * Walks the vma's mapping a page and mlocks the page if any locked vma's are + * found. Once one is found the page is locked and the scan can be terminated. + */Can you please add that this requires the mmap_sem() lock to the comments?
Why does this require mmap_sem() lock? Also mmap_sem() lock of which mm_struct?
quoted
+static bool page_mlock_one(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma, + unsigned long address, void *unused) +{ + struct page_vma_mapped_walk pvmw = { + .page = page, + .vma = vma, + .address = address, + }; + + /* An un-locked vma doesn't have any pages to lock, continue the scan */ + if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)) + return true; + + while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) { + /* PTE-mapped THP are never mlocked */ + if (!PageTransCompound(page)) + mlock_vma_page(page); + page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw); + + /* + * no need to continue scanning other vma's if the page has + * been locked. + */ + return false; + } + + return true; +}