Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] i2c: designware: Use the correct name of device-managed function
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2021-02-18 18:08:55
Also in:
linux-i2c, linux-pci, lkml
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 11:04:57PM +0800, Dejin Zheng wrote:
Use the new function pcim_alloc_irq_vectors() to allocate IRQ vectors, the pcim_alloc_irq_vectors() function, an explicit device-managed version of pci_alloc_irq_vectors(). If pcim_enable_device() has been called before, then pci_alloc_irq_vectors() is actually a device-managed function. It is used here as a device-managed function, So replace it with pcim_alloc_irq_vectors(). At the same time, Remove the pci_free_irq_vectors() function to simplify the error handling path. the freeing resources will take automatically when device is gone.
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> One side note below.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Dejin Zheng <redacted> --- v3 -> v4: - add some commit comments. v2 -> v3: - simplify the error handling path. v1 -> v2: - Modify some commit messages. drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c | 15 ++++----------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c index 55c83a7a24f3..620b41e373b6 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-pcidrv.c@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static int i2c_dw_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, if (!dev) return -ENOMEM; - r = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, 1, 1, PCI_IRQ_ALL_TYPES); + r = pcim_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, 1, 1, PCI_IRQ_ALL_TYPES); if (r < 0) return r;@@ -234,10 +234,8 @@ static int i2c_dw_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, if (controller->setup) { r = controller->setup(pdev, controller); - if (r) { - pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev); + if (r) return r; - } } i2c_dw_adjust_bus_speed(dev);@@ -246,10 +244,8 @@ static int i2c_dw_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, i2c_dw_acpi_configure(&pdev->dev); r = i2c_dw_validate_speed(dev); - if (r) { - pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev); + if (r) return r; - } i2c_dw_configure(dev);@@ -269,10 +265,8 @@ static int i2c_dw_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, adap->nr = controller->bus_num; r = i2c_dw_probe(dev); - if (r) { - pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev); + if (r) return r; - } pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&pdev->dev, 1000); pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);@@ -292,7 +286,6 @@ static void i2c_dw_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) i2c_del_adapter(&dev->adapter); devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, dev->irq, dev); - pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
I'm wondering if we need explicit devm_free_irq() call now. If we don't, it can be cleaned up in the separate change with a motivation that we got to device managed PCI IRQ allocation and thus the ordering will be correct (needs a double check!).
} /* work with hotplug and coldplug */ -- 2.25.0
-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko