Re: [PATCH v6] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement passive mode with HWP enabled
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-08-05 09:37:52
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
Hi Doug, On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 7:07 PM Doug Smythies [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Rafael, I was just writing you about V5 when this V6 came. On 2020.08.04 08:11 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: ...quoted
This is on top of the material already in the mainline.Oh, should have read that part better, but did get there in the end. ...quoted
v5 -> v6: * Fix the problem with the EPP setting via sysfs not working with the performance and powersave governors by stopping and restarting the governor around the sysfs-based EPP updates in the passive mode. * Because of that, use the epp_cached field just for avoiding the above if the new EPP value for the given CPU is the same as the old one. * Export cpufreq_start/stop_governor() from the core (for the above).EPP is still not right. I am not messing with it at all, just observing via my msr-decoder.
If you are not touching it, then it should not change in the passive mode.
I booted without any intel_pstate related directives for the kernel command line. The below is as expected (performance gov.):
Note that the active mode performance scaling algorithm (which is not the same as the performance cpufreq governor) sets the EPP to 0 for all of the CPUs that it is used with and the driver sets the EPP to 255 in ->stop_cpu. That last bit is questionable, but that's the active mode behavior which is not changed by the $subject patch. It would be more reasonable to restore the previous EPP when stopping CPUs. Let me cut a v7 with that changed.
# /home/doug/c/msr-decoder
How many CPUs?: 6
8.) 0x198: IA32_PERF_STATUS : CPU 0-5 : 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 :
B.) 0x770: IA32_PM_ENABLE: 1 : HWP enable
1.) 0x19C: IA32_THERM_STATUS: 88450000
2.) 0x1AA: MSR_MISC_PWR_MGMT: 401CC0 EIST enabled Coordination enabled OOB Bit 8 reset OOB Bit 18 reset
3.) 0x1B1: IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS: 88430000
4.) 0x64F: MSR_CORE_PERF_LIMIT_REASONS: 0
A.) 0x1FC: MSR_POWER_CTL: 3C005D : C1E disable : EEO disable : RHO disable
5.) 0x771: IA32_HWP_CAPABILITIES (performance): 109252E : high 46 : guaranteed 37 : efficient 9 : lowest 1
6.) 0x774: IA32_HWP_REQUEST: CPU 0-5 :
raw: 00002E2E : 00002E2E : 00002E2E : 00002E2E : 00002E2E : 00002E2E :
min: 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 :
max: 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 :
des: 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 :
epp: 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 :
act: 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 :
7.) 0x777: IA32_HWP_STATUS: 4 : high 4 : guaranteed 0 : efficient 0 : lowest 0
and then switched to passive mode later. EPP is not as expected. Expect 0
(performance mode):
# /home/doug/c/msr-decoder
How many CPUs?: 6
8.) 0x198: IA32_PERF_STATUS : CPU 0-5 : 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 :
B.) 0x770: IA32_PM_ENABLE: 1 : HWP enable
1.) 0x19C: IA32_THERM_STATUS: 88440000
2.) 0x1AA: MSR_MISC_PWR_MGMT: 401CC0 EIST enabled Coordination enabled OOB Bit 8 reset OOB Bit 18 reset
3.) 0x1B1: IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS: 88420000
4.) 0x64F: MSR_CORE_PERF_LIMIT_REASONS: 0
A.) 0x1FC: MSR_POWER_CTL: 3C005D : C1E disable : EEO disable : RHO disable
5.) 0x771: IA32_HWP_CAPABILITIES (performance): 108252E : high 46 : guaranteed 37 : efficient 8 : lowest 1
6.) 0x774: IA32_HWP_REQUEST: CPU 0-5 :
raw: FF002E2E : FF002E2E : FF002E2E : FF002E2E : FF002E2E : FF002E2E :
min: 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 :
max: 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 :
des: 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 :
epp: 255 : 255 : 255 : 255 : 255 : 255 :
act: 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 :
7.) 0x777: IA32_HWP_STATUS: 4 : high 4 : guaranteed 0 : efficient 0 : lowest 0The 0xFF EPP value is what the active mode left behind and the passive mode doesn't touch the EPP at all.
Then switched to ondemand governor, and put 100% load on 2 CPUs.
EPP is not as expected, which I don't actually know what to expect,
but assume 128:
# /home/doug/c/msr-decoder
How many CPUs?: 6
8.) 0x198: IA32_PERF_STATUS : CPU 0-5 : 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 :
B.) 0x770: IA32_PM_ENABLE: 1 : HWP enable
1.) 0x19C: IA32_THERM_STATUS: 883B0000
2.) 0x1AA: MSR_MISC_PWR_MGMT: 401CC0 EIST enabled Coordination enabled OOB Bit 8 reset OOB Bit 18 reset
3.) 0x1B1: IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS: 882B0000
4.) 0x64F: MSR_CORE_PERF_LIMIT_REASONS: 0
A.) 0x1FC: MSR_POWER_CTL: 3C005D : C1E disable : EEO disable : RHO disable
5.) 0x771: IA32_HWP_CAPABILITIES (performance): 10B252E : high 46 : guaranteed 37 : efficient 11 : lowest 1
6.) 0x774: IA32_HWP_REQUEST: CPU 0-5 :
raw: FF002E09 : FF002E0C : FF002E2E : FF002E08 : FF002E2E : FF002E18 :
min: 9 : 12 : 46 : 8 : 46 : 24 :
max: 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 : 46 :
des: 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 :
epp: 255 : 255 : 255 : 255 : 255 : 255 :
act: 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 : 0 :
7.) 0x777: IA32_HWP_STATUS: 4 : high 4 : guaranteed 0 : efficient 0 : lowest 0It is still 0xFF as previously (because the passive mode doesn't change the EPP).
For what it's worth, Kernel: 78b39581ed85 (HEAD -> dtemp) cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement passive mode with HWP enabled c0842fbc1b18 (origin/master, origin/HEAD, master) random32: move the pseudo-random 32-bit definitions to prandom.h 2baa85d6927d Merge tag 'acpi-5.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm 04084978003c Merge tag 'pm-5.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm
Thanks!