Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement passive mode with HWP enabled
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2020-08-01 16:39:33
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2020-08-01 16:39:33
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
On Tue, 2020-07-28 at 17:09 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hi All, On Monday, July 27, 2020 5:13:40 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:quoted
On Thursday, July 16, 2020 7:37:04 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:quoted
This really is a v2 of this patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11663271/ with an extra preceding cleanup patch to avoid making unrelated changes in the [2/2].
I applied this series along with [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix EPP setting via sysfs in active mode on 5.8 latest master (On top of raw epp patchset). When intel_pstate=passive from kernel command line then it is fine, no crash. But switch dynamically, crashed: Attached crash.txt. I may need to try your linux-pm tree. Then after some playing I reached a state when I monitor MSR 0x774: while true; do rdmsr 0x774; sleep 1; done 80002704 ... ... ff000101 ff000101 ff000101 ff000101 ff000101 ff000101 ff000101 ff000101 Don't have a recipe to reproduce this. Thanks, Srinivas
quoted
Almost the same as before, but the first patch has been reworked to handle errors in store_energy_performance_preference() correctly and rebased on top of the current linux-pm.git branch. No functional changes otherwise.One more update of the second patch. Namely, I realized that the hwp_dynamic_boost sysfs switch was present in the passive mode after the v3 (and the previous versions) of that patch which isn't correct, so this modifies it to avoid exposing hwp_dynamic_boost in the passive mode. The first patch is the same as in the v2. Thanks!