Hi Geert,

Many thanks for the series upgrade.
A few static-analysis findings below (could be false positives).

On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 09:42:51AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

[..]

+static bool isrange(const char *s)
+{
+	size_t n = strlen(s);

Cppcheck 1.40-18521-ge6d692d96058:
drivers/gpio/gpio-aggregator.c:69:11: style: Variable 'n' is assigned a value that is never used. [unreadVariable]

Smatch v0.5.0-6150-gc1ed13e4ee7b:
drivers/gpio/gpio-aggregator.c:69 isrange() warn: unused return: n = strlen()

[..]

+	aggr->lookups->dev_id = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s.%d", DRV_NAME, id);
+	if (!aggr->lookups) {
+		res = -ENOMEM;
+		goto remove_idr;
+	}

s/aggr->lookups/aggr->lookups->dev_id/ ?

[..]

+static int gpio_fwd_get_multiple(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned long *mask,
+				 unsigned long *bits)
+{
+	struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+	unsigned long *values, flags;

gcc 9.2.1:
warning: ‘flags’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]

[..]

+static void gpio_fwd_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned long *mask,
+				  unsigned long *bits)
+{
+	struct gpiochip_fwd *fwd = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+	unsigned long *values, flags;

gcc 9.2.1, same as above:
warning: ‘flags’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]

Should these be silenced like in 2bf593f101f3ca ("xilinx_uartps.c:
suppress "may be used uninitialised" warning") ?

I plan to do some runtime testing soon.

-- 
Best Regards,
Eugeniu