Re: [PATCH v11 00/13] Intel SGX1 support
From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Date: 2018-12-10 07:47:41
Also in:
kvm, linux-crypto, lkml, platform-driver-x86
From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Date: 2018-12-10 07:47:41
Also in:
kvm, linux-crypto, lkml, platform-driver-x86
On Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 09:06:00PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: ...
quoted
quoted
quoted
The default permissions for the device are 600.Good. This does not belong to non-root.There are entirely legitimate use cases for using this as an unprivileged user. However, that'll be up to system and distribution policy, which can evolve over time, and it makes sense for the *initial* kernel permission to start out root-only and then adjust permissions via udev.Agreed.quoted
Building a software certificate store. Hardening key-agent software like ssh-agent or gpg-agent. Building a challenge-response authentication system. Providing more assurance that your server infrastructure is uncompromised. Offloading computation to a system without having to fully trust that system.I think you can do the crypto stuff... as crypto already verifies the results. But I don't think you can do the computation offload.
You can, as long as you can do attestation.
quoted
As one of many possibilities, imagine a distcc that didn't have to trust the compile nodes. The compile nodes could fail to return results at all, but they couldn't alter the results.distcc on untrusted nodes ... oh yes, that would be great. Except that you can't do it, right? :-). First, AFAICT it would be quite hard to get gcc to run under SGX. But maybe you have spare month or three and can do it.
Assuming you don't need to #include files, gcc seems quite simple to run in an enclave: data in, computation inside, data out.