Thread (11 messages) flat view 11 messages, 3 authors, 25d ago

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: stm32: Document st,stm32mp23/25-syscfg subnodes and cells

From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Date: 2026-08-31 17:13:21
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, lkml

On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 06:27:21PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 8/31/26 5:05 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:

Hello Conor,
quoted
quoted
quoted
Sashiko comment here I believe is valid, the syntax here only works if
there's only the listed compatible present. It doesn't work with
fallbacks.
This syntax is used all over the place ?

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml-allOf:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml-  - $ref:
ahci-common.yaml#
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml-
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml-  - if:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml-      properties:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml-        compatible:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml:          contains:
                                                                      ^^^^^^^^
This is the key difference, you need "contains" for partial matches.
Uh ... right ... fixed in V5. Thank you.
quoted
quoted
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml-            enum:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml-              -
qcom,apq8064-ahci
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml-              -
qcom,ipq806x-ahci
quoted
pw-bot: changes-requested
quoted
       then:
         required:
           - "#clock-cells"
+        - "#address-cells"
+        - "#size-cells"
else, false? But I'm also not sure what the benefit is of requiring
addr/size cells when the child node is not?
The subnodes of this syscfg node have reg property , see [PATCH v4 0/4]
arm64: dts: st: Add STM32MP2 USB support .
Right, but I was questioning why the properties describing the reg
property in children is required when the children (and thus the reg
property in them) were not made required.
Do you mean this patternProperties should be made required in here ?

"
+patternProperties:
+  "^phy@[0-9a-f]+$":
"

Could you please give me a hint how to do that ? git grep gives me nothing.
I mean, if the phys aren't going to be required I would not make the
cells properties required. I seem to recall a warning that dtbs_check
can emit when there are size/addr cells properties in a node where there
are no children, which is why I questioned this in the first place.

Otherwise, if the phys are to be made required (no idea if they should
be), I can only recall this being done with the non-pattern variant. IOW
required:
  - phy@0
  - phy@1

Cheers,
Conor.

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help