Re: [PATCH v9 7/8] iio: adc: ad4030: Add support for ADAQ4216 and ADAQ4224
From: Andy Shevchenko <hidden>
Date: 2026-02-17 12:44:06
Also in:
linux-doc, linux-iio, lkml
On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 12:01:12PM -0300, Marcelo Schmitt wrote:
ADAQ4216 and ADAQ4224 are similar to AD4030, but feature a PGA circuitry that scales the analog input signal prior to it reaching the ADC. The PGA is controlled through a pair of pins (A0 and A1) whose state define the gain that is applied to the input signal. Add support for ADAQ4216 and ADAQ4224. Provide a list of PGA options through the IIO device channel scale available interface and enable control of the PGA through the channel scale interface.
...
+static void ad4030_fill_scale_avail(struct ad4030_state *st)
+{
+ unsigned int mag_bits, int_part, fract_part, i;
+ u64 range;
+
+ /*
+ * The maximum precision of differential channels is retrieved from the
+ * chip properties. The output code of differential channels is in two's
+ * complement format (i.e. signed), so the MSB is the sign bit and only
+ * (precision_bits - 1) bits express voltage magnitude.
+ */
+ mag_bits = st->chip->precision_bits - 1;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(adaq4216_hw_gains_frac); i++) {
Can be
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(adaq4216_hw_gains_frac); i++) {
which is still under 80 and makes the top definition cleaner and code robust
by not exposing loop iterator out of the loop's scope.
+ range = mult_frac(st->vref_uv, adaq4216_hw_gains_frac[i][1], + adaq4216_hw_gains_frac[i][0]); + /* + * If range were in mV, we would multiply it by NANO below. + * Though, range is in µV so multiply it by MICRO only so the + * result after right shift and division scales output codes to + * millivolts. + */ + int_part = div_u64_rem(((u64)range * MICRO) >> mag_bits, NANO, &fract_part); + st->scale_avail[i][0] = int_part; + st->scale_avail[i][1] = fract_part; + } +}
...
+static int ad4030_set_pga(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int gain_int, int gain_fract)
+{
+ struct ad4030_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
+ unsigned int mag_bits = st->chip->precision_bits - 1;
+ u64 gain_nano, tmp;
+
+ if (!st->pga_gpios)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ gain_nano = gain_int * NANO + gain_fract;
+ if (!in_range(gain_nano, 1, ADAQ4616_PGA_GAIN_MAX_NANO))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ tmp = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(gain_nano << mag_bits, NANO);+ gain_nano = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(st->vref_uv, tmp);
This (second one only) doesn't sound like a 64-bit division. Can tmp be bigger than 32-bit?
+ st->pga_index = find_closest(gain_nano, adaq4216_hw_gains_vpv, + ARRAY_SIZE(adaq4216_hw_gains_vpv)); + + return ad4030_set_pga_gain(st); +}
...
+static int ad4030_setup_pga(struct device *dev, struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
+ struct ad4030_state *st)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+ int pga_gain_dB;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "adi,pga-gain-db", &pga_gain_dB);
+ if (ret == -EINVAL) {
Actually instead of custom error hunting, this should be rather
if (device_property_present(dev, "adi,pga-gain-db")) {
ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "adi,pga-gain-db", &pga_gain_dB);
if (ret)
return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to get PGA value.\n");
} else {
+ /* Setup GPIOs for PGA control */ + st->pga_gpios = devm_gpiod_get_array(dev, "pga", GPIOD_OUT_LOW); + if (IS_ERR(st->pga_gpios)) + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(st->pga_gpios), + "Failed to get PGA gpios.\n"); + + if (st->pga_gpios->ndescs != ADAQ4616_PGA_PINS) + return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, + "Expected 2 GPIOs for PGA control.\n"); + + st->scale_avail_size = ARRAY_SIZE(adaq4216_hw_gains_db); + st->pga_index = 0; + return 0;
+ } else if (ret) {
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to get PGA value.\n");
+ }(this goes above)
+ /* Set ADC driver to handle pin-strapped PGA pins setup */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(adaq4216_hw_gains_db); i++) {
+ if (pga_gain_dB != adaq4216_hw_gains_db[i])
+ continue;
+
+ st->pga_index = i;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(adaq4216_hw_gains_db))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "Invalid PGA gain: %d.\n",
+ pga_gain_dB);
+
+ st->scale_avail_size = 1;
+ st->pga_gpios = NULL;
+
+ return 0;
+}-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko