Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 4 authors, 2024-09-03

Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: display: panel: Rename WL-355608-A8 panel

From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Date: 2024-08-27 16:28:24
Also in: dri-devel

On 30/06/2024 10:16, Ryan Walklin wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024, at 5:59 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 04:34:11PM GMT, Conor Dooley wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 05:04:19PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 02:25:54PM GMT, Neil Armstrong wrote:
quoted
Can it be more specific ? because there's a lot of rg35xx defined in bindings:
  anbernic,rg351m
  anbernic,rg351v
  anbernic,rg353p
  anbernic,rg353ps
  anbernic,rg353v
  anbernic,rg353vs
  anbernic,rg35xx-2024
  anbernic,rg35xx-plus
  anbernic,rg35xx-h
Just to note only the three rg35xx-* devices use this particular panel.
quoted
quoted
quoted
Yeah, if we have an identified model name, we should probably use that,
with a comment that we couldn't figure out what the vendor was and thus
went for anbernic.
What's wrong with using the wl name that already exists as the model?
Using rg<whatever>-panel is total invention on our part, especially
seeing as the commit message says that multiple models can use it.
Yeah, that makes sense, sorry for the noise
Thanks both for the further feedback, agreed logical to use the device vendor and panel serial number, ie "anbernic,wl-355608-a8". Will post a V2 with a comment to that effect.
Well in this case we can keep "wl-355608-a8", because the panel vendor _is not_ anbernic.

Neil
Regards,

Ryan
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help