Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: display: panel: Rename WL-355608-A8 panel
From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Date: 2024-08-27 16:28:24
Also in:
dri-devel
On 30/06/2024 10:16, Ryan Walklin wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024, at 5:59 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 04:34:11PM GMT, Conor Dooley wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 05:04:19PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 02:25:54PM GMT, Neil Armstrong wrote:quoted
Can it be more specific ? because there's a lot of rg35xx defined in bindings: anbernic,rg351m anbernic,rg351v anbernic,rg353p anbernic,rg353ps anbernic,rg353v anbernic,rg353vs anbernic,rg35xx-2024 anbernic,rg35xx-plus anbernic,rg35xx-hJust to note only the three rg35xx-* devices use this particular panel.quoted
quoted
quoted
Yeah, if we have an identified model name, we should probably use that, with a comment that we couldn't figure out what the vendor was and thus went for anbernic.What's wrong with using the wl name that already exists as the model? Using rg<whatever>-panel is total invention on our part, especially seeing as the commit message says that multiple models can use it.Yeah, that makes sense, sorry for the noiseThanks both for the further feedback, agreed logical to use the device vendor and panel serial number, ie "anbernic,wl-355608-a8". Will post a V2 with a comment to that effect.
Well in this case we can keep "wl-355608-a8", because the panel vendor _is not_ anbernic. Neil
Regards, Ryan