On 27/08/2023 14:57, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

The entire patch is not needed. At least should not be needed. What
problem are you trying to solve here?

The main problem is the next chunk, which (currently) explicitly
requires `interrupts' property. My goal is to allow
`interrupts-extended' in addition to `interrupts'.

They are allowed. Why do you think they aren't? That's why I don't
understand what real problem is here.

qcom-pm8xxx.yaml lists `interrupts' property under the `required'
clause. So I can not simply replace it with `interrupts-extended'

Since when? So again: The entire patch is not needed.

Hmm, interesting. I'm pretty sure that I saw the issue, but now I can
no longer reproduce it. Maybe I misinterpreted some other warning
which I saw while this was WIP.
I see that it is handled by the `fixup_interrupts` in dtschema itself.

If interrupts were brought by some other schema and that one did not
evaluate, then you could see errors about interrupt-extended. But that's
not the case here.

Best regards,
Krzysztof