Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mmc: Add driver for LiteX's LiteSDCard interface
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2021-12-10 08:05:21
Also in:
linux-mmc, lkml
Hi Gabriel, On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 9:58 PM Gabriel L. Somlo [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 09:31:49AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:quoted
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 9:14 PM Gabriel L. Somlo [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
I did *some* of this for v3, but since figured out how to use `pahole` :)Right, pahole.quoted
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:07:56AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:quoted
quoted
+struct litex_mmc_host { + struct mmc_host *mmc; + struct platform_device *dev; + + void __iomem *sdphy; + void __iomem *sdcore; + void __iomem *sdreader; + void __iomem *sdwriter; + void __iomem *sdirq; + + u32 resp[4]; + u16 rca; + + void *buffer; + size_t buf_size; + dma_addr_t dma; + + unsigned int freq; + unsigned int clock; + bool is_bus_width_set; + bool app_cmd; + + int irq; + struct completion cmd_done;You may want to reorder the members to avoid implicit gaps (i.e. structs first, followed by integral types in decreasing size).So, for v4, I'll have it looking like this, which `pahole` says is optimally packed: struct litex_mmc_host { struct mmc_host * mmc; /* 0 8 */ struct platform_device * dev; /* 8 8 */ void * sdphy; /* 16 8 */ void * sdcore; /* 24 8 */ void * sdreader; /* 32 8 */ void * sdwriter; /* 40 8 */ void * sdirq; /* 48 8 */ void * buffer; /* 56 8 */ /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */ size_t buf_size; /* 64 8 */size_t is 32-bit on RV32, so you may want to move it below cmd_done.quoted
dma_addr_t dma; /* 72 8 */ struct completion cmd_done; /* 80 32 */ int irq; /* 112 4 */ unsigned int ref_clk; /* 116 4 */ unsigned int sd_clk; /* 120 4 */ u32 resp[4]; /* 124 16 */ /* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) was 12 bytes ago --- */ u16 rca; /* 140 2 */ bool is_bus_width_set; /* 142 1 */ bool app_cmd; /* 143 1 */ /* size: 144, cachelines: 3, members: 18 */ /* last cacheline: 16 bytes */ };After a bit of a fight, I managed to wrestle `pahole` to display useful information for 32-bit (rv32imac) builds: struct litex_mmc_host { struct mmc_host * mmc; /* 0 4 */ struct platform_device * dev; /* 4 4 */ void * sdphy; /* 8 4 */ void * sdcore; /* 12 4 */ void * sdreader; /* 16 4 */ void * sdwriter; /* 20 4 */ void * sdirq; /* 24 4 */ void * buffer; /* 28 4 */ size_t buf_size; /* 32 4 */ dma_addr_t dma; /* 36 4 */ struct completion cmd_done; /* 40 16 */ int irq; /* 56 4 */ unsigned int ref_clk; /* 60 4 */ /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */ unsigned int sd_clk; /* 64 4 */ u32 resp[4]; /* 68 16 */ u16 rca; /* 84 2 */ bool is_bus_width_set; /* 86 1 */ bool app_cmd; /* 87 1 */ /* size: 88, cachelines: 2, members: 18 */ /* last cacheline: 24 bytes */ }; Looks like even with `size_t buf_size` where it is right now, there still are no holes. I like it where it is, as it's related to the
Right, dma_addr_t is 32-bit, too. I'm just too used to LPAE on ARM ;-)
field immediately preceding it (`buffer`). I'd rather not move it, particularly since we're not actually eliminating any additional holes.
Thanks, LGTM.
What do you think (i.e., is there a configuration where there's still a chance we may run into trouble)?
ICONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=y/CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT=y
on 32-bit, but that doesn't seem to be supported under arch/risc/ yet.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds