The 12/09/2021 13:59, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 10:46:14AM +0100, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
quoted
+int lan966x_vlan_port_set_vid(struct lan966x_port *port, u16 vid,
+ bool pvid, bool untagged)
+{
+ struct lan966x *lan966x = port->lan966x;
+
+ /* Egress vlan classification */
+ if (untagged && port->vid != vid) {
+ if (port->vid) {
+ dev_err(lan966x->dev,
+ "Port already has a native VLAN: %d\n",
+ port->vid);
+ return -EBUSY;
Are you interested in supporting the use case from 0da1a1c48911 ("net:
mscc: ocelot: allow a config where all bridge VLANs are egress-untagged")?
Because it would be good if the driver was structured that way from the
get-go instead of patching it later.
Currently not, but I don't know what will happen in 1 month or 6
months.
quoted
+ }
+ port->vid = vid;
+ }
+
+ /* Default ingress vlan classification */
+ if (pvid)
+ port->pvid = vid;
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
/Horatiu