Re: [PATCH 0/2] clk: samsung: exynos850: Implement CMU_CMGP
From: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Date: 2021-11-18 19:55:47
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 18:44, Sam Protsenko [off-list ref] wrote:
This series adds CMU_CMGP clock domain to Exynos850 clock driver. In
particular it needs to enable HSI2C (High-Speed I2C) nodes. This series
depends on CMU_APM series [1].
Tested via /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary:
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< cut here >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
enable prepare protect
clock count count count rate
---------------------------------------------------------------------
clk_rco_cmgp 0 0 0 49152000
oscclk 1 1 0 26000000
mout_cmgp_adc 0 0 0 26000000
...
gout_clkcmu_cmgp_bus 1 1 0 399750000
gout_cmgp_usi1_pclk 0 0 0 399750000
gout_cmgp_usi0_pclk 0 0 0 399750000
gout_gpio_cmgp_pclk 0 0 0 399750000
dout_cmgp_adc 0 0 0 28553572
mout_cmgp_usi1 0 0 0 399750000
dout_cmgp_usi1 0 0 0 199875000
gout_cmgp_usi1_ipclk 0 0 0 199875000
mout_cmgp_usi0 0 0 0 399750000
dout_cmgp_usi0 0 0 0 199875000
gout_cmgp_usi0_ipclk 0 0 0 199875000
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< cut here >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/10/22/979
Sam Protsenko (2):
dt-bindings: clock: samsung: Document Exynos850 CMU_CMGP
clk: samsung: exynos850: Implement CMU_CMGP domain
.../clock/samsung,exynos850-clock.yaml | 19 ++++
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos850.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++
include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos850.h | 17 +++
3 files changed, 136 insertions(+)
--Hi Sylwester, Can you please review my patches I've submitted recently? Those are: - [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: samsung: Document Exynos850 CMU_APM - [PATCH 2/2] clk: samsung: exynos850: Implement CMU_APM domain - [PATCH 1/1] clk: samsung: exynos850: Register clocks early - [PATCH 0/2] clk: samsung: exynos850: Implement CMU_CMGP - [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: samsung: Document Exynos850 CMU_CMGP - [PATCH 2/2] clk: samsung: exynos850: Implement CMU_CMGP domain My further series (like device tree patches for new dev board support) depend on the status of above patches. So it'd great if those can be reviewed and applied if it's feasible. Thanks!
2.30.2