Quoting pillair@codeaurora.org (2021-10-28 06:08:39)

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Boyd <redacted>
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 12:05 AM
To: Rakesh Pillai <redacted>; agross@kernel.org;
bjorn.andersson@linaro.org; mathieu.poirier@linaro.org; ohad@wizery.com;
p.zabel@pengutronix.de; robh+dt@kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
kernel@vger.kernel.org; sibis@codeaurora.org; mpubbise@codeaurora.org;
kuabhs@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] Add support for sc7280 WPSS PIL loading

Quoting Rakesh Pillai (2021-10-03 23:48:50)

quoted

Add support for PIL loading of WPSS co-processor for SC7280 SOCs.

Changes from v4/v5:
- Add yaml conversion for adsp/cdsp dt-bindings
- Change clock names in wpss dt-bindings
- Correct mistake in signed-off enail ID

Can you keep a running tally here of the full progression of the series?
That helps to look back and make sure we don't make a comment that has
already been made before.

One more request. Can you add support for 'firmware-name' like there is in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,q6v5.txt so that we
can install firmware into some namespaced/versioned place instead of
having to put wpss files into /lib/firmware?

Hi Stephen,
I have posted v7 with the support for firmware-name to be provided in the DT entry.

Thanks. I didn't see it in my inbox. No Cc for me?

quoted

It would also be nice to load a
single firmware file instead of having to split the file into many pieces.

This would require lot of changes and lot of code duplication from request firmware.
Also the base ath11k firmware files have been posted as split files.

Other firmwares have done it so it seems technically possible. So
nothing is preventing it?