Re: [PATCH 4/4] pinctrl: renesas: pinctrl-rzg2l: Add support to get/set drive-strength and output-impedance-ohms
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2021-10-28 07:56:37
Also in:
linux-gpio, linux-renesas-soc, lkml
Hi Prabhakar, On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 3:45 PM Lad Prabhakar [off-list ref] wrote:
Add support to get/set drive-strength and output-impedance-ohms for the supported pins. While at it also renamed the below macros to match the HW manual, PIN_CFG_IOLH_SD0 -> PIN_CFG_IO_VMC_SD0 PIN_CFG_IOLH_SD1 -> PIN_CFG_IO_VMC_SD1 PIN_CFG_IOLH_QSPI -> PIN_CFG_IO_VMC_QSPI PIN_CFG_IOLH_ETH0 -> PIN_CFG_IO_VMC_ETH0 PIN_CFG_IOLH_ETH1 -> PIN_CFG_IO_VMC_ETH1 Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Thanks for the update!
--- RFC->v1 * Renamed macros to match HW manual
You may want to split that off into a separate patch, as not all lines changed are touched for other reasons. BTW, where do I find these "VMC" names in the HW manual?
* Added PIN_CFG_IOLH_A/B macros to differentiate Group A/B * Added helper function to read/rmw pin config * Included RB tags
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c
+static u32 rzg2l_read_pin_config(void __iomem *addr, + u8 bit, u32 mask)
The above fits on a single line.
+{
+ void __iomem *addr_adjust = addr;
+ u8 bit_adjust = bit;No need for these, just operate on addr and bit directly.
+ u32 reg;
+
+ if (bit >= 4) {
+ bit_adjust -= 4;
+ addr_adjust += 4;
+ }
+
+ reg = readl(addr_adjust) & (mask << (bit_adjust * 8));
+ return (reg >> (bit_adjust * 8));
+}
+
+static void rzg2l_rmw_pin_config(void __iomem *addr,
+ u8 bit, u32 mask, u32 val)
+{The above fits on a single line.
+ void __iomem *addr_adjust = addr; + u8 bit_adjust = bit;
No need for these, just operate on addr and bit directly.
+ u32 reg;
+
+ if (bit >= 4) {
+ bit_adjust -= 4;
+ addr_adjust += 4;
+ }
+
+ reg = readl(addr_adjust) & ~(mask << (bit_adjust * 8));
+
+ writel(reg | val, addr_adjust);I think you should handle "val << (bit * 8)" here, instead of in all callers.
+}
Please split the introduction of these helpers (and add conversion of the existing PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_ENABLE handling) off into a separate patch.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -484,6 +544,34 @@ static int rzg2l_pinctrl_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, break; } + case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH: { + static const unsigned int mA[4] = { 2, 4, 8, 12 }; + + if (!(cfg & PIN_CFG_IOLH_A)) + return -EINVAL; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags); + addr = pctrl->base + IOLH(port); + reg = rzg2l_read_pin_config(addr, bit, IOLH_MASK); + arg = mA[reg]; + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
Do you need the spinlock for reading?
+ break;
+ }
+
+ case PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT_IMPEDANCE_OHMS: {
+ static const unsigned int oi[4] = { 100, 66, 50, 33 };
+
+ if (!(cfg & PIN_CFG_IOLH_B))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ addr = pctrl->base + IOLH(port);
+ reg = rzg2l_read_pin_config(addr, bit, IOLH_MASK);
+ arg = oi[reg];
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);Likewise.
+ break;
+ }
+
default:
return -ENOTSUPP;
}quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -564,6 +659,49 @@ static int rzg2l_pinctrl_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags); break; } + + case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH: { + unsigned int arg = pinconf_to_config_argument(_configs[i]); + static const unsigned int mA[4] = { 2, 4, 8, 12 };
Duplicate, move to file scope?
+
+ if (!(cfg & PIN_CFG_IOLH_A))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mA); i++) {
+ if (arg == mA[i])
+ break;
+ }
+ if (i >= ARRAY_SIZE(mA))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ addr = pctrl->base + IOLH(port);
+ rzg2l_rmw_pin_config(addr, bit, IOLH_MASK, (i << (bit * 8)));
Pass pctrl and offset instead of addr (also for rzg2l_read_pin_config,
for symmetry), and move locking into rzg2l_rmw_pin_config()?
Taking all of the above into account, that would become:
rzg2l_rmw_pin_config(pctrl, IOLH(port), bit, IOLH_MASK, i);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ case PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT_IMPEDANCE_OHMS: {
+ unsigned int arg = pinconf_to_config_argument(_configs[i]);
+ static const unsigned int oi[4] = { 100, 66, 50, 33 };Duplicate, move to file scope?
+
+ if (!(cfg & PIN_CFG_IOLH_B))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(oi); i++) {
+ if (arg == oi[i])
+ break;
+ }
+ if (i >= ARRAY_SIZE(oi))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ addr = pctrl->base + IOLH(port);
+ rzg2l_rmw_pin_config(addr, bit, IOLH_MASK, (i << (bit * 8)));Likewise.
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
+ break;
+ }
+
default:
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
The rest looks good to me!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds