Hi Rob, Stephen,

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 3:59 PM Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 6:02 PM Stephen Boyd [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Quoting Rob Herring (2021-10-14 09:18:16)

quoted

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 1:48 AM Lee Jones [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

I don't explicitly build DT documentation.

Since I use the build bots to let me know if there are strange !(C,
ASM, arm, aarch64, mips, ppc, x86) build issues or ones with odd
configuration possibilities (randconfig) in the repos I maintain, you
might have to convince them that this is important too.

It's really just a matter of turning on the build in
allyesconfig/allmodconfig builds. I've not done that primarily because
there's one person I don't want to yell at me, but I could probably
make it arm and/or arm64 only. It's really arch and config
independent, so doing it multiple times is kind of pointless.

I assume for bots you mean kernel-ci mainly? Do you run that before
stuff gets into linux-next? IMO, that's too late. But still a slight
improvement if things go in via one tree. Otherwise, I see the
breakage twice, 1st linux-next then the merge window.

I run `make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES="<path to yaml file>"` but
nowadays this seems to check all the bindings and not just the one
binding I care to check. Did something break?

It should apply all the schemas to the example in DT_SCHEMA_FILES.
Originally, it only applied DT_SCHEMA_FILES schema to the example in
DT_SCHEMA_FILES.

Probably Stephen means that yamllint is still run on all files, which
I tried to fix in [1]?

I've been running an improved version for months, but I haven't sent
it out yet.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20210309112148.2309116-1-geert+renesas@glider.be (local)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds