Thread (28 messages) 28 messages, 5 authors, 2021-10-08

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] regulator/mfd/clock: dt-bindings: Samsung S2M and S5M to dtschema

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-06 12:55:53
Also in: linux-clk, linux-samsung-soc, lkml

On 05/10/2021 15:14, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2021, Mark Brown wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 11:40:56AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
quoted
Merging/dependencies
====================
1. Regulator related binding changes depend on first two commits (the
   fixes), because of context.
2. The mfd bindings depend on clock and regulator bindings.

The fixes and bindings changes (patches 1-10) should go via the same
tree.  For example regulator or mfd tree.  I propose the regulator tree,
since it will have also one driver change (the fix, first commit).
Lee, Stephen, Michael does Krzysztof's plan make sense to you?
I tend to take cross subsystem patches.  MFD is usually in the centre
of these scenarios and I have tooling to easily set-up immutable
branches/pull-requests.

Always happy to discuss if others have different/better ideas though.
Another alternative is that regulator patches (1-2, 4-6) go via Mark who
later gives you a stable branch/tag to pull. Then the clock and MFD
bindings would go on top via MFD tree.

There is a comment from Rob which I will fix in v3.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help