Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] regulator/mfd/clock: dt-bindings: Samsung S2M and S5M to dtschema
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-06 12:55:53
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-06 12:55:53
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
On 05/10/2021 15:14, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2021, Mark Brown wrote:quoted
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 11:40:56AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:quoted
Merging/dependencies ==================== 1. Regulator related binding changes depend on first two commits (the fixes), because of context. 2. The mfd bindings depend on clock and regulator bindings. The fixes and bindings changes (patches 1-10) should go via the same tree. For example regulator or mfd tree. I propose the regulator tree, since it will have also one driver change (the fix, first commit).Lee, Stephen, Michael does Krzysztof's plan make sense to you?I tend to take cross subsystem patches. MFD is usually in the centre of these scenarios and I have tooling to easily set-up immutable branches/pull-requests. Always happy to discuss if others have different/better ideas though.
Another alternative is that regulator patches (1-2, 4-6) go via Mark who later gives you a stable branch/tag to pull. Then the clock and MFD bindings would go on top via MFD tree. There is a comment from Rob which I will fix in v3. Best regards, Krzysztof