Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] regulator/mfd/clock: dt-bindings: Samsung S2M and S5M to dtschema
From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-05 13:15:06
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-05 13:15:06
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
On Tue, 05 Oct 2021, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 11:40:56AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:quoted
Merging/dependencies ==================== 1. Regulator related binding changes depend on first two commits (the fixes), because of context. 2. The mfd bindings depend on clock and regulator bindings. The fixes and bindings changes (patches 1-10) should go via the same tree. For example regulator or mfd tree. I propose the regulator tree, since it will have also one driver change (the fix, first commit).Lee, Stephen, Michael does Krzysztof's plan make sense to you?
I tend to take cross subsystem patches. MFD is usually in the centre of these scenarios and I have tooling to easily set-up immutable branches/pull-requests. Always happy to discuss if others have different/better ideas though. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog