Hi

On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:59 PM Stephen Boyd [off-list ref] wrote:

Quoting Philip Chen (2021-09-24 16:54:13)

quoted

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-ti-sn65dsi86.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-ti-sn65dsi86.dtsi
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7b1034a5a8e9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-ti-sn65dsi86.dtsi

@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
+/*
+ * Google Trogdor dts fragment for the boards with TI sn65dsi86 edp bridge
+ *
+ * Copyright 2021 Google LLC.
+ */
+
+&dsi0_out {
+       remote-endpoint = <&sn65dsi86_in>;
+       data-lanes = <0 1 2 3>;
+};
+
+&edp_brij_i2c {
+       sn65dsi86_bridge: bridge@2d {
+               compatible = "ti,sn65dsi86";
+               reg = <0x2d>;
+               pinctrl-names = "default";
+               pinctrl-0 = <&edp_brij_en>, <&edp_brij_irq>;

Why not move edp_brij_en as well? I think you want to reuse the node
name for the other bridge, but it doesn't make sense unless that other
patch is part of this series.

Yes, I posted v2 with the other patch enabling the second source edp bridge.

quoted

+               gpio-controller;
+               #gpio-cells = <2>;
+
+               interrupt-parent = <&tlmm>;
+               interrupts = <11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+
+               enable-gpios = <&tlmm 104 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;