Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 10/12] net: lan966x: add port module support
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Date: 2021-09-20 13:54:39
Also in:
linux-phy, linux-pm, lkml, netdev
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 11:52:16AM +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
+static void lan966x_cleanup_ports(struct lan966x *lan966x)
+{
+ struct lan966x_port *port;
+ int portno;
+
+ for (portno = 0; portno < lan966x->num_phys_ports; portno++) {
+ port = lan966x->ports[portno];
+ if (!port)
+ continue;
+
+ if (port->phylink) {
+ rtnl_lock();
+ lan966x_port_stop(port->dev);
+ rtnl_unlock();
+ port->phylink = NULL;This leaks the phylink structure. You need to call phylink_destroy().
static int lan966x_probe_port(struct lan966x *lan966x, u8 port,
phy_interface_t phy_mode)
{
struct lan966x_port *lan966x_port;
+ struct phylink *phylink;
+ struct net_device *dev;
+ int err;
if (port >= lan966x->num_phys_ports)
return -EINVAL;
- lan966x_port = devm_kzalloc(lan966x->dev, sizeof(*lan966x_port),
- GFP_KERNEL);
+ dev = devm_alloc_etherdev_mqs(lan966x->dev,
+ sizeof(struct lan966x_port), 8, 1);
+ if (!dev)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ SET_NETDEV_DEV(dev, lan966x->dev);
+ lan966x_port = netdev_priv(dev);
+ lan966x_port->dev = dev;
lan966x_port->lan966x = lan966x;
lan966x_port->chip_port = port;
lan966x_port->pvid = PORT_PVID;
lan966x->ports[port] = lan966x_port;
+ dev->max_mtu = ETH_MAX_MTU;
+
+ dev->netdev_ops = &lan966x_port_netdev_ops;
+ dev->needed_headroom = IFH_LEN * sizeof(u32);
+
+ err = register_netdev(dev);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(lan966x->dev, "register_netdev failed\n");
+ goto err_register_netdev;
+ }register_netdev() publishes the network device.
+ + lan966x_port->phylink_config.dev = &lan966x_port->dev->dev; + lan966x_port->phylink_config.type = PHYLINK_NETDEV; + lan966x_port->phylink_config.pcs_poll = true; + + phylink = phylink_create(&lan966x_port->phylink_config, + lan966x_port->fwnode, + phy_mode, + &lan966x_phylink_mac_ops);
phylink_create() should always be called _prior_ to the network device being published. In any case...
+ if (IS_ERR(phylink)) + return PTR_ERR(phylink);
If this fails, this function returns an error, but leaves the network device published - which is a bug in itself.
+static void lan966x_phylink_mac_link_down(struct phylink_config *config,
+ unsigned int mode,
+ phy_interface_t interface)
+{Hmm? Shouldn't this do something? -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!