Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2021-08-19

RE: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mmc: fsl-imx-esdhc: change the pinctrl-names rule

From: Bough Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
Date: 2021-08-19 03:30:39
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-mmc

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Herring [mailto:robh@kernel.org]
Sent: 2021年8月19日 2:33
To: Bough Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
Cc: shawnguo@kernel.org; s.hauer@pengutronix.de; ulf.hansson@linaro.org;
kernel@pengutronix.de; festevam@gmail.com; dl-linux-imx
[off-list ref]; Aisheng Dong [off-list ref];
devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mmc: fsl-imx-esdhc: change the
pinctrl-names rule

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 05:46:24PM +0800, haibo.chen@nxp.com wrote:
quoted
From: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>

Change the pinctrl-names rule to cover all cases.

Signed-off-by: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
---
 .../bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml           | 21 +++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
index 17086f60f8a3..d324606a4f0a 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
@@ -116,12 +116,21 @@ properties:
       - const: per

   pinctrl-names:
-    minItems: 1
-    items:
-      - const: default
-      - const: state_100mhz
-      - const: state_200mhz
-      - const: sleep
+    oneOf:
+      - items:
+          - const: default
+          - const: state_100mhz
+          - const: state_200mhz
+          - const: sleep
+      - items:
+          - const: default
+          - const: state_100mhz
+          - const: state_200mhz
You can drop this one and add 'minItems: 3' to the first case.
Okay, I will do that.
quoted
+      - items:
+          - const: default
+          - const: sleep
+      - items:
+          - const: default
Similar here too with the prior case. Or use 'minItems: 1' in the first case. That
additional allows the 2 entry case, but why isn't that valid?
Couldn't a board only support default+state_100mhz?
Logically not, for board, if support SD3.0 mode, this means it support both SDR104/SDR50/DDR50/HS200/HS400
State_100mhz is used for SDR50 and DDR50, state_200mhz is used for SDR104/HS200/HS400.

So, if there is state_100mhz, there should be state_200mhz.

Rest Regards
Haibo Chen
Rob
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help