Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] iio: frequency: adrf6780: add support for ADRF6780
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-07-17 13:24:26
Also in:
linux-iio, lkml
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 14:42:09 +0300 Antoniu Miclaus [off-list ref] wrote:
The ADRF6780 is a silicon germanium (SiGe) design, wideband, microwave upconverter optimized for point to point microwave radio designs operating in the 5.9 GHz to 23.6 GHz frequency range. Datasheet: https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/ADRF6780.pdf Signed-off-by: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com>
Hi Antoniu As it looks like we'll have a v7, a few trivial comments from me. ...
+
+static int adrf6780_init(struct adrf6780_dev *dev)
+{
+ int ret;
+ unsigned int chip_id, enable_reg, enable_reg_msk;
+ struct spi_device *spi = dev->spi;
+
+ /* Perform a software reset */
+ ret = adrf6780_reset(dev);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = adrf6780_spi_read(dev, ADRF6780_REG_CONTROL, &chip_id);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ chip_id = FIELD_GET(ADRF6780_CHIP_ID_MSK, chip_id);
+ if (chip_id != ADRF6780_CHIP_ID) {
+ dev_err(&spi->dev, "ADRF6780 Invalid Chip ID.\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ enable_reg_msk = ADRF6780_VGA_BUFFER_EN_MSK |
+ ADRF6780_DETECTOR_EN_MSK |
+ ADRF6780_LO_BUFFER_EN_MSK |
+ ADRF6780_IF_MODE_EN_MSK |
+ ADRF6780_IQ_MODE_EN_MSK |
+ ADRF6780_LO_X2_EN_MSK |
+ ADRF6780_LO_PPF_EN_MSK |
+ ADRF6780_LO_EN_MSK |
+ ADRF6780_UC_BIAS_EN_MSK;
+
+ enable_reg = FIELD_PREP(ADRF6780_VGA_BUFFER_EN_MSK, dev->vga_buff_en) |
+ FIELD_PREP(ADRF6780_DETECTOR_EN_MSK, 1) |
+ FIELD_PREP(ADRF6780_LO_BUFFER_EN_MSK, dev->lo_buff_en) |
+ FIELD_PREP(ADRF6780_IF_MODE_EN_MSK, dev->if_mode_en) |
+ FIELD_PREP(ADRF6780_IQ_MODE_EN_MSK, dev->iq_mode_en) |
+ FIELD_PREP(ADRF6780_LO_X2_EN_MSK, dev->lo_x2_en) |
+ FIELD_PREP(ADRF6780_LO_PPF_EN_MSK, dev->lo_ppf_en) |
+ FIELD_PREP(ADRF6780_LO_EN_MSK, dev->lo_en) |
+ FIELD_PREP(ADRF6780_UC_BIAS_EN_MSK, dev->uc_bias_en);Here we are probably turning on a bunch of stuff which will result in power usage. Would it be sensible to turn it off again in remove path? (devm managed should be fine).
+ + ret = adrf6780_spi_update_bits(dev, ADRF6780_REG_ENABLE, enable_reg_msk, enable_reg); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ret = adrf6780_spi_update_bits(dev, ADRF6780_REG_LO_PATH, + ADRF6780_LO_SIDEBAND_MSK, + FIELD_PREP(ADRF6780_LO_SIDEBAND_MSK, dev->lo_sideband)); + if (ret) + return ret; + + return adrf6780_spi_update_bits(dev, ADRF6780_REG_ADC_CONTROL, + ADRF6780_VDET_OUTPUT_SELECT_MSK, + FIELD_PREP(ADRF6780_VDET_OUTPUT_SELECT_MSK, dev->vdet_out_en)); +} +
+static void adrf6780_dt_parse(struct adrf6780_dev *dev)
Trivial nitpick, but given this is all device property based (great) the dt naming is now misleading. Perhaps _properties_parse() ?
+{
+ struct spi_device *spi = dev->spi;
+
+ dev->vga_buff_en = device_property_read_bool(&spi->dev, "adi,vga-buff-en");
+ dev->lo_buff_en = device_property_read_bool(&spi->dev, "adi,lo-buff-en");
+ dev->if_mode_en = device_property_read_bool(&spi->dev, "adi,if-mode-en");
+ dev->iq_mode_en = device_property_read_bool(&spi->dev, "adi,iq-mode-en");
+ dev->lo_x2_en = device_property_read_bool(&spi->dev, "adi,lo-x2-en");
+ dev->lo_ppf_en = device_property_read_bool(&spi->dev, "adi,lo-ppf-en");
+ dev->lo_en = device_property_read_bool(&spi->dev, "adi,lo-en");
+ dev->uc_bias_en = device_property_read_bool(&spi->dev, "adi,uc-bias-en");
+ dev->lo_sideband = device_property_read_bool(&spi->dev, "adi,lo-sideband");
+ dev->vdet_out_en = device_property_read_bool(&spi->dev, "adi,vdet-out-en");
+}