Hi,
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 01:32:08AM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Crystal Guo <redacted>
add infracfg_rst node which is for MT8195 platform
Signed-off-by: Crystal Guo <redacted>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
index 629cd883facf..8cda62f736b3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/reset/ti-syscon.h>
/ {
compatible = "mediatek,mt8195";@@ -273,6 +274,20 @@
};
};
+ infracfg: syscon@10001000 {
+ compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-infracfg", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
This block is named infracfg_ao in the datasheet. You seem to rename it
in the clock patch. Maybe you squashed the change into the wrong commit?
+ reg = <0 0x10001000 0 0x1000>;
The address range matches the datasheet.
+ #clock-cells = <1>;
+
+ infracfg_rst: reset-controller {
+ compatible = "ti,syscon-reset";
+ #reset-cells = <1>;
+ ti,reset-bits = <
+ 0x140 26 0x144 26 0 0 (ASSERT_SET | DEASSERT_SET | STATUS_NONE)
+ >;
+ };
This node doesn't seem to be used anywhere. Is it really needed?
ChenYu