Re: [PATCH 01/27] arm64: dts: mt8195: add infracfg_rst node
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Date: 2021-06-16 08:02:06
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, lkml
Hi, On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 01:32:08AM +0800, Tinghan Shen wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Crystal Guo <redacted> add infracfg_rst node which is for MT8195 platform Signed-off-by: Crystal Guo <redacted> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi index 629cd883facf..8cda62f736b3 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> +#include <dt-bindings/reset/ti-syscon.h> / { compatible = "mediatek,mt8195";@@ -273,6 +274,20 @@ }; }; + infracfg: syscon@10001000 { + compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-infracfg", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
This block is named infracfg_ao in the datasheet. You seem to rename it in the clock patch. Maybe you squashed the change into the wrong commit?
+ reg = <0 0x10001000 0 0x1000>;
The address range matches the datasheet.
+ #clock-cells = <1>;
+
+ infracfg_rst: reset-controller {
+ compatible = "ti,syscon-reset";
+ #reset-cells = <1>;
+ ti,reset-bits = <
+ 0x140 26 0x144 26 0 0 (ASSERT_SET | DEASSERT_SET | STATUS_NONE)
+ >;
+ };This node doesn't seem to be used anywhere. Is it really needed? ChenYu _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel