Thread (21 messages) flat view 21 messages, 3 authors, 2021-06-25

Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/dts/qcom/sc7180: Add Display Port dt node

From: Bjorn Andersson <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-07 23:33:06
Also in: linux-arm-msm, lkml

On Mon 07 Jun 12:48 CDT 2021, khsieh@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2021-06-05 22:07, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
quoted
On Thu 03 Jun 16:56 CDT 2021, khsieh@codeaurora.org wrote:
quoted
On 2021-06-03 09:53, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
quoted
On Thu 03 Jun 11:09 CDT 2021, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
[..]
quoted
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor.dtsi
[..]
quoted
quoted
quoted
+				power-domains = <&rpmhpd SC7180_CX>;
Just curious, but isn't the DP block in the MDSS_GDCS? Or do we need to
mention CX here in order for the opp framework to apply required-opps
of CX?
yes,
If you want me, or other maintainers, to spend any time reviewing or
applying your patches going forward then you need to actually bother
replying properly to the questions asked.

Thanks,
Bjorn
Sorry about the confusion. What I meant is that even though DP controller is
in the MDSS_GDSC
power domain, DP PHY/PLL sources out of CX. The DP link clocks have a direct
impact
on the CX voltage corners. Therefore, we need to mention the CX power domain
here. And, since
we can associate only one OPP table with one device, we picked the DP link
clock over other
clocks.
Thank you, that's a much more useful answer.

Naturally I would think it would make more sense for the PHY/PLL driver
to ensure that CX is appropriately voted for then, but I think that
would result in it being the clock driver performing such vote and I'm
unsure how the opp table for that would look.

@Stephen, what do you say?

Regards,
Bjorn
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help