Hi Michał,

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 04:28:47PM +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:54:06AM +0200, Stephan Gerhold wrote:

quoted

KX023-1025 [1] is another accelerometer from Kionix that has lots
of additional functionality compared to KXCJK-1013. It combines the
motion interrupt functionality from KXCJK with the tap detection
from KXTF9, plus a lot more other functionality.

When I researched KXTF9 support it occurred to me that the -10xx part is
duplicating the information in 'KXyyy' - it seems to be a project number
or something. I would suggest to use just 'kx023' prefix for the code
and DT but leave the full identification in the comments/description.

There do seem to be two different KXTF9 from Kionix, a KXTF9-4100 [1]
and a KXTF9-2050 [2] with separate datasheets. Have you checked if there
is a meaningful difference between them?

In any case, I think for KX023 there is only KX023-1025,
so I suppose I can omit it. I used KX023-1025 as name mostly for
consistency, although I did change the convention a bit already since
"kionix,kx0231025" was terribly readable.

So both the current "kionix,kx023-1025" and "kionix,kx023" would be fine
with me, any other opinions?

Thanks!
Stephan

[1]: https://kionixfs.azureedge.net/en/datasheet/KXTF9-4100%20Specifications%20Rev%206.pdf
[2]: https://kionixfs.azureedge.net/en/datasheet/KXTF9-2050%20Specifications%20Rev%207.pdf