Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] i2c: mpc: make interrupt mandatory and remove polling code
From: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date: 2021-04-11 23:57:15
Also in:
linux-i2c, lkml
On 11/04/21 8:16 am, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 02:52:04PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:quoted
All the in-tree dts files that use one of the compatible strings from i2c-mpc.c provide an interrupt property. By making this mandatory we can simplify the code. Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>After I applied this patch, cppcheck reports: CPPCHECK drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c:401:47: warning: Either the condition 'div?(int)div->fdr:-EINVAL' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: div. [nullPointerRedundantCheck] *real_clk = fsl_get_sys_freq() / prescaler / div->divider; ^ drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c:402:13: note: Assuming that condition 'div?(int)div->fdr:-EINVAL' is not redundant return div ? (int)div->fdr : -EINVAL; ^ drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c:401:47: note: Null pointer dereference *real_clk = fsl_get_sys_freq() / prescaler / div->divider; ^ Can you check this? I'd think we can fix it incrementally...
What are the arguments passed to cppcheck? I've tried two versions I have easy access to (1.82 and 1.86) neither report problems when invoked as `cppcheck drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c` nor do they complain about this with `--enable=all`. Looking at the code I can see what it's complaining about, div should have a value since mpc_i2c_dividers_8xxx does not have a sentinel value so I think the div check is unnecessary.