Quoting Sibi Sankar (2021-03-08 21:58:21)

On 2021-02-27 19:26, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:

quoted

On 2021-02-27 00:16, Stephen Boyd wrote:

quoted

Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2021-02-25 23:51:00)

quoted

On 2021-02-26 01:11, Stephen Boyd wrote:

quoted

Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2021-02-25 01:30:24)

quoted

Add a DT node for the AOSS QMP on SC7280 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi

b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
index 65c1e0f2fb56..cbd567ccc04e 100644

--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/power/qcom-aoss-qmp.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/soc/qcom,rpmh-rsc.h>

 / {

@@ -368,6 +369,19 @@ pdc: interrupt-controller@b220000 {
                        interrupt-controller;
                };

+               aoss_qmp: qmp@c300000 {

power-domain-controller@c300000? power-controller@c300000?

Its an AOSS message RAM and all other SM* SoCs have as qmp@
and the dt binding as well, I see only SM8150 with power-controller,
that should probably be fixed?

Node name should be generic while still being meaningful. Nobody knows
what qmp is, but power-controller makes sense. Can you fix this and 
the
others to be power-controller?

we probably would be changing them back
to qmp or something more generic soon
since the consensus was qmp wasn't a
power-controller. So not sure if its
worth the effort here.

Hmm alright. Maybe mailbox? qmp is not generic. What does it stand for?
qualcomm messaging protocol?