Thread (97 messages) 97 messages, 6 authors, 2021-02-22

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 23/26] KVM: arm64: Refactor __populate_fault_info()

From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-02-03 15:59:56
Also in: kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, lkml

On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 12:15:21PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Refactor __populate_fault_info() to introduce __get_fault_info() which
will be used once the host is wrapped in a stage 2.

Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h | 36 +++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
index 84473574c2e7..e9005255d639 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
@@ -157,19 +157,9 @@ static inline bool __translate_far_to_hpfar(u64 far, u64 *hpfar)
 	return true;
 }
 
-static inline bool __populate_fault_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static inline bool __get_fault_info(u64 esr, u64 *far, u64 *hpfar)
Could this take a pointer to a struct kvm_vcpu_fault_info instead?

Will
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help