Re: [RFC PATCH v2 23/26] KVM: arm64: Refactor __populate_fault_info()
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-02-03 15:59:56
Also in:
kvmarm, linux-devicetree, lkml
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 12:15:21PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Refactor __populate_fault_info() to introduce __get_fault_info() which will be used once the host is wrapped in a stage 2. Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <redacted> --- arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h | 36 +++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h index 84473574c2e7..e9005255d639 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h@@ -157,19 +157,9 @@ static inline bool __translate_far_to_hpfar(u64 far, u64 *hpfar) return true; } -static inline bool __populate_fault_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +static inline bool __get_fault_info(u64 esr, u64 *far, u64 *hpfar)
Could this take a pointer to a struct kvm_vcpu_fault_info instead? Will _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel