Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 4 authors, 2020-09-17

Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: mux-j7200-wiz: Add lane function defines

From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Date: 2020-09-17 13:02:28
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, lkml

On 14:53-20200917, Peter Rosin wrote:
[..]
I do not have a tree and dt-patches should normally not go *through* me.
yep. 
But I'd still like to see what's happening.
I did not realize this was going to cause a *lot* of churn in the dt
files. How bad can it be when the file is new in this cycle? And is it
worth it? But it seems you all see problems with the current naming and
in that case it must surely be better to fix it early?
yes - I think I can figure it out.
And if it's a lot, maybe it needs to be more than one patch? I get the
feeling this will need to be taken care of by someone other than me,
because I'm just the maintainer of a very small subsystem and I don't
normally have to deal with "big" issues involving several trees. I would
be a bottleneck.
No a pain, I think I can help get it through, may be, I worry too much..
Lets see how the cleanup series looks like.

Roger: I am not touching the j7200 series till we cleanup j721e as
discussed in this thread. please use 5.9-rc1 as your baseline for
cleanup. Once available, we can figure out how to get 5.10-rc1 staged
items later. Window is narrowing rather soon, so appreciate a quick
cleaup :).

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help