Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/7] drivers: thermal: tsens: Add VER_0 tsens version
From: Amit Kucheria <hidden>
Date: 2020-08-13 11:19:22
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-pm, lkml
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 6:48 PM [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
-----Messaggio originale----- Da: Amit Kucheria [off-list ref]
quoted
quoted
if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[i])) return PTR_ERR(priv->rf[i]); }@@ -775,12 +800,80 @@ int __init init_common(struct tsens_priv*priv)quoted
goto err_put_device; } - priv->rf[TSENS_EN] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev, priv->srot_map, - priv->fields[TSENS_EN]); - if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_EN])) { - ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_EN]); - goto err_put_device; + if (tsens_version(priv) >= VER_0_1) { + priv->rf[TSENS_EN] = devm_regmap_field_alloc( + dev, priv->srot_map, priv->fields[TSENS_EN]); + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_EN])) { + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_EN]); + goto err_put_device; + } + + priv->rf[SENSOR_EN] = devm_regmap_field_alloc( + dev, priv->srot_map, priv->fields[SENSOR_EN]); + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[SENSOR_EN])) { + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[SENSOR_EN]); + goto err_put_device; + } + priv->rf[INT_EN] = devm_regmap_field_alloc( + dev, priv->tm_map, priv->fields[INT_EN]); + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[INT_EN])) { + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[INT_EN]); + goto err_put_device; + } + } else {Let's not create two big sections with if-else for 8960 and everything else. For example, what is wrong with using common code for TSENS_EN? If the concern is memory wasted trying to allocate fields not present on this older platform, perhaps consider adding a check in the loop to break early in case of 8960?About TSENS_EN the old platform doesn't have SROT so I need to use TM_MAP. Should I set the srot map to match the tm map so we can use the common function? Aside from this problem, I will try to remove the big if-else.
Ick. I guess srot_map and tm_map pointing to the same region is the lesser of two evils? It makes it so this will be constrained to a single place in init_common().