R: [RFC PATCH v5 1/7] drivers: thermal: tsens: Add VER_0 tsens version
From: <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Date: 2020-08-11 13:18:35
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-pm, lkml
-----Messaggio originale----- Da: Amit Kucheria [off-list ref] Inviato: martedì 11 agosto 2020 14:58 A: Ansuel Smith [off-list ref] Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>; Bjorn Andersson [off-list ref]; Zhang Rui [off-list ref]; Daniel Lezcano [off-list ref]; Rob Herring [off-list ref]; Linux PM list [off-list ref]; linux-arm-msm <linux-arm- msm@vger.kernel.org>; open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS [off-list ref]; LKML <linux- kernel@vger.kernel.org> Oggetto: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/7] drivers: thermal: tsens: Add VER_0 tsens version On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 11:44 PM Ansuel Smith [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
VER_0 is used to describe device based on tsens version before v0.1. These device are devices based on msm8960 for example apq8064 or ipq806x. Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> --- drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 160 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------quoted
drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h | 7 +- 2 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c index 9fe9a2b26705..78840c1bc5d2 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c@@ -516,6 +516,15 @@ static irqreturn_t tsens_irq_thread(int irq, void*data)quoted
dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: no violation: %d\n", hw_id, __func__, temp); } + + if (tsens_version(priv) < VER_0_1) { + /* Constraint: There is only 1 interrupt control register forallquoted
+ * 11 temperature sensor. So monitoring more than 1sensor basedquoted
+ * on interrupts will yield inconsistent result. To overcomethisquoted
+ * issue we will monitor only sensor 0 which is the mastersensor.quoted
+ */ + break; + } } return IRQ_HANDLED;@@ -531,6 +540,13 @@ static int tsens_set_trips(void *_sensor, int low,int high)quoted
int high_val, low_val, cl_high, cl_low; u32 hw_id = s->hw_id; + if (tsens_version(priv) < VER_0_1) { + /* Pre v0.1 IP had a single register for each type of interrupt + * and thresholds + */ + hw_id = 0; + } + dev_dbg(dev, "[%u] %s: proposed thresholds: (%d:%d)\n", hw_id, __func__, low, high);@@ -550,6 +566,12 @@ static int tsens_set_trips(void *_sensor, int low,int high)quoted
tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, LOWER, true); tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, UPPER, true); + /* VER_0 require to set MIN and MAX THRESH */ + if (tsens_version(priv) < VER_0_1) { + regmap_field_write(priv->rf[MIN_THRESH_0], 0); + regmap_field_write(priv->rf[MAX_THRESH_0], 120000);Since MIN_THRESH_0 and MAX_THRESH_0 are the only two threshold on pre 0.1 IP, just (mis)use the already predefined LOW_THRESH_0 and UP_THRESH_0 in regfield_ids in init_common() below? Then we won't need this special casing here. All the special casing ugliness can then stay in init_common() with comments.quoted
+ } + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->ul_lock, flags); dev_dbg(dev, "[%u] %s: (%d:%d)->(%d:%d)\n",@@ -584,18 +606,21 @@ int get_temp_tsens_valid(const structtsens_sensor *s, int *temp)quoted
u32 valid; int ret; - ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[valid_idx], &valid); - if (ret) - return ret; - while (!valid) { - /* Valid bit is 0 for 6 AHB clock cycles. - * At 19.2MHz, 1 AHB clock is ~60ns. - * We should enter this loop very, very rarely. - */ - ndelay(400); + /* VER_0 doesn't have VALID bit */ + if (tsens_version(priv) >= VER_0_1) {Since 8960 needs a custom get_temp function, is this change really needed?
The get_temp_tsens_valid function is used to setup interrupt, think this is the best way instead of add an if and call get_temp in the setup interrupt function (instead of using get_temp_valid)
quoted
ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[valid_idx], &valid); if (ret) return ret; + while (!valid) { + /* Valid bit is 0 for 6 AHB clock cycles. + * At 19.2MHz, 1 AHB clock is ~60ns. + * We should enter this loop very, very rarely. + */ + ndelay(400); + ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[valid_idx], &valid); + if (ret) + return ret; + } } /* Valid bit is set, OK to read the temperature */@@ -765,8 +790,8 @@ int __init init_common(struct tsens_priv *priv) if (tsens_version(priv) > VER_0_1) { for (i = VER_MAJOR; i <= VER_STEP; i++) { - priv->rf[i] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev, priv->srot_map, - priv->fields[i]); + priv->rf[i] = devm_regmap_field_alloc( + dev, priv->srot_map, priv->fields[i]);This doesn't change any code, simply reformats the code to 80 columns. Avoid adding such lines to other features, makes it harder to review changes. Please ignore the 80 column warning here and elsewhere below when it is only going over by a few characters. Run checkpatch on your patches which has now increased the number of columns to 100 now.quoted
if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[i])) return PTR_ERR(priv->rf[i]); }@@ -775,12 +800,80 @@ int __init init_common(struct tsens_priv*priv)quoted
goto err_put_device; } - priv->rf[TSENS_EN] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev, priv->srot_map, - priv->fields[TSENS_EN]); - if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_EN])) { - ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_EN]); - goto err_put_device; + if (tsens_version(priv) >= VER_0_1) { + priv->rf[TSENS_EN] = devm_regmap_field_alloc( + dev, priv->srot_map, priv->fields[TSENS_EN]); + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_EN])) { + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_EN]); + goto err_put_device; + } + + priv->rf[SENSOR_EN] = devm_regmap_field_alloc( + dev, priv->srot_map, priv->fields[SENSOR_EN]); + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[SENSOR_EN])) { + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[SENSOR_EN]); + goto err_put_device; + } + priv->rf[INT_EN] = devm_regmap_field_alloc( + dev, priv->tm_map, priv->fields[INT_EN]); + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[INT_EN])) { + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[INT_EN]); + goto err_put_device; + } + } else {Let's not create two big sections with if-else for 8960 and everything else. For example, what is wrong with using common code for TSENS_EN? If the concern is memory wasted trying to allocate fields not present on this older platform, perhaps consider adding a check in the loop to break early in case of 8960?
About TSENS_EN the old platform doesn't have SROT so I need to use TM_MAP. Should I set the srot map to match the tm map so we can use the common function? Aside from this problem, I will try to remove the big if-else.
quoted
+ priv->rf[TSENS_EN] = devm_regmap_field_alloc( + dev, priv->tm_map, priv->fields[TSENS_EN]); + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_EN])) { + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_EN]); + goto err_put_device; + } + + priv->rf[TSENS_SW_RST] = devm_regmap_field_alloc( + dev, priv->tm_map, priv->fields[TSENS_EN]); + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_EN])) { + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_EN]); + goto err_put_device; + } + + /* enable TSENS */ + regmap_field_write(priv->rf[TSENS_EN], 1); + + priv->rf[LOW_INT_CLEAR_0] = devm_regmap_field_alloc( + dev, priv->tm_map, priv->fields[LOW_INT_CLEAR_0]); + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[LOW_INT_CLEAR_0])) { + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[LOW_INT_CLEAR_0]); + goto err_put_device; + } + + priv->rf[UP_INT_CLEAR_0] = devm_regmap_field_alloc( + dev, priv->tm_map, priv->fields[UP_INT_CLEAR_0]); + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[UP_INT_CLEAR_0])) { + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[UP_INT_CLEAR_0]); + goto err_put_device; + } + + priv->rf[MIN_THRESH_0] = devm_regmap_field_alloc( + dev, priv->tm_map, priv->fields[MIN_THRESH_0]); + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[MIN_THRESH_0])) { + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[MIN_THRESH_0]); + goto err_put_device; + } + + priv->rf[MAX_THRESH_0] = devm_regmap_field_alloc( + dev, priv->tm_map, priv->fields[MAX_THRESH_0]); + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[MAX_THRESH_0])) { + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[MAX_THRESH_0]); + goto err_put_device; + } + + priv->rf[TRDY] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev, priv->tm_map, + priv->fields[TRDY]); + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[TRDY])) { + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[TRDY]); + goto err_put_device; + } } + ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[TSENS_EN], &enabled); if (ret) goto err_put_device;@@ -790,19 +883,6 @@ int __init init_common(struct tsens_priv *priv) goto err_put_device; } - priv->rf[SENSOR_EN] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev, priv-srot_map, - priv->fields[SENSOR_EN]); - if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[SENSOR_EN])) { - ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[SENSOR_EN]); - goto err_put_device; - } - priv->rf[INT_EN] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev, priv->tm_map, - priv->fields[INT_EN]); - if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[INT_EN])) { - ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[INT_EN]); - goto err_put_device; - } - /* This loop might need changes if enum regfield_ids is reordered */ for (j = LAST_TEMP_0; j <= UP_THRESH_15; j += 16) { for (i = 0; i < priv->feat->max_sensors; i++) {@@ -856,7 +936,11 @@ int __init init_common(struct tsens_priv *priv) } spin_lock_init(&priv->ul_lock); - tsens_enable_irq(priv); + + /* VER_0 interrupt doesn't need to be enabled */ + if (tsens_version(priv) >= VER_0_1) + tsens_enable_irq(priv); + tsens_debug_init(op); err_put_device:@@ -952,10 +1036,18 @@ static int tsens_register_irq(struct tsens_priv*priv, char *irqname,quoted
if (irq == -ENXIO) ret = 0; } else { - ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, - NULL, thread_fn, - IRQF_ONESHOT, - dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv); + /* VER_0 have a different interrupt type */Say how it is different.quoted
+ if (tsens_version(priv) > VER_0) + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL, + thread_fn, IRQF_ONESHOT, + dev_name(&pdev->dev), + priv); + else + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, + thread_fn, NULL, + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, + dev_name(&pdev->dev), + priv); if (ret) dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: failed to get irq\n", __func__);diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.hb/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.hquoted
index 59d01162c66a..f1120791737c 100644--- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h@@ -25,7 +25,8 @@ struct tsens_priv; /* IP version numbers in ascending order */ enum tsens_ver { - VER_0_1 = 0, + VER_0 = 0, + VER_0_1, VER_1_X, VER_2_X, };@@ -441,6 +442,10 @@ enum regfield_ids { CRIT_THRESH_14, CRIT_THRESH_15, + /* VER_0 MIN MAX THRESH */ + MIN_THRESH_0, + MAX_THRESH_0, + /* WATCHDOG */ WDOG_BARK_STATUS, WDOG_BARK_CLEAR, --2.27.0