Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 2 authors, 2020-06-29

Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] arm64: allwinner: A100: add the basical Allwinner A100 DTSI file

From: Maxime Ripard <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-29 18:51:52
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk, linux-gpio, linux-pm, lkml

Hi,

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:59:05AM +0800, Frank Lee wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Allwinner A100 is a new SoC with Cortex-A53 cores, this commit adds
the basical DTSI file of it, including the clock, i2c, pins, sid, ths,
and UART support.

Signed-off-by: Frank Lee <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a100.dtsi | 337 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 337 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a100.dtsi
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a100.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a100.dtsi
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5133897
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a100.dtsi
@@ -0,0 +1,337 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ or MIT)
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2020 Frank Lee <frank@allwinnertech.com>
+ */
+
+#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/clock/sun50i-a100-ccu.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/clock/sun50i-a100-r-ccu.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/reset/sun50i-a100-ccu.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/reset/sun50i-a100-r-ccu.h>
+
+/ {
+	interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
+	#address-cells = <2>;
+	#size-cells = <2>;
+
+	cpus {
+		#address-cells = <1>;
+		#size-cells = <0>;
+
+		cpu0: cpu@0 {
+			compatible = "arm,armv8";
+			device_type = "cpu";
+			reg = <0x0>;
+			enable-method = "psci";
+		};
+
+		cpu@1 {
+			compatible = "arm,armv8";
+			device_type = "cpu";
+			reg = <0x1>;
+			enable-method = "psci";
+		};
+
+		cpu@2 {
+			compatible = "arm,armv8";
+			device_type = "cpu";
+			reg = <0x2>;
+			enable-method = "psci";
+		};
+
+		cpu@3 {
+			compatible = "arm,armv8";
+			device_type = "cpu";
+			reg = <0x3>;
+			enable-method = "psci";
+		};
+	};
+
+	psci {
+		compatible = "arm,psci-1.0";
+		method = "smc";
+	};
+
+	iosc: internal-osc-clk {
+		compatible = "fixed-clock";
+		clock-frequency = <16000000>;
+		clock-accuracy = <300000000>;
+		clock-output-names = "iosc";
+		#clock-cells = <0>;
+	};
+
+	dcxo24M: dcxo24M_clk {
You shouldn't have underscores in the node names.
+		compatible = "fixed-clock";
+		clock-frequency = <24000000>;
+		clock-output-names = "dcxo24M";
+		#clock-cells = <0>;
+	};
+
+	osc32k: osc32k_clk {
Same thing here

Also, ordering by node name here would be nice
+		compatible = "fixed-clock";
+		clock-frequency = <32768>;
+		clock-output-names = "osc32k";
+		#clock-cells = <0>;
+	};
+
+	timer {
+		compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
+		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13
+			(GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>,
+			     <GIC_PPI 14
+			(GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>,
+			     <GIC_PPI 11
+			(GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>,
+			     <GIC_PPI 10
+			(GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
+	};
Does it suffer from the same time instability than the one in the A64?
If so, you probably want to enable the workaround too.
+	soc: soc {
Do you really need a label for that node?
+		compatible = "simple-bus";
+		#address-cells = <2>;
+		#size-cells = <2>;
Why do you need cells with 2 items here? You don't seem to be using
them.
+		r_i2c0: i2c@7081400 {
+			compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-i2c";
+			reg = <0x0 0x07081400 0x0 0x400>;
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 113 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_I2C0>;
+			resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_I2C0>;
+			pinctrl-names = "default";
+			pinctrl-0 = <&r_i2c0_pins>;
+			status = "disabled";
+			#address-cells = <1>;
+			#size-cells = <0>;
+		};
+
+		r_i2c1: i2c@7081800 {
+			compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-i2c";
+			reg = <0x0 0x07081800 0x0 0x400>;
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 114 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_I2C1>;
+			resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_I2C1>;
+			pinctrl-names = "default";
+			pinctrl-0 = <&r_i2c1_pins>;
+			status = "disabled";
+			#address-cells = <1>;
+			#size-cells = <0>;
+		};
+	};
The clocks and resets phandles and IDs don't look right
+	thermal-zones {
+		cpu_thermal_zone {
+			polling-delay-passive = <0>;
+			polling-delay = <0>;
+			thermal-sensors = <&ths 0>;
+		};
Please add a new line here
+		gpu_thermal_zone{
You should have a space here    ^ 
+			polling-delay-passive = <0>;
+			polling-delay = <0>;
+			thermal-sensors = <&ths 1>;
+		};
newline
+		ddr_thermal_zone{
space                           ^ 

Thanks!
Maxime

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help