Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: m_can: Add Documentation for transceiver regulator
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: 2020-02-21 08:31:26
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-can, lkml, netdev
On 2/21/20 9:31 AM, Faiz Abbas wrote:
Hi Rob, On 20/02/20 2:05 am, Rob Herring wrote:quoted
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 07:58:34PM +0530, Faiz Abbas wrote:quoted
Some CAN transceivers have a standby line that needs to be asserted before they can be used. Model this GPIO lines as an optional fixed-regulator node. Document bindings for the same. Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <redacted> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)This has moved to DT schema in my tree, so please adjust it and resend.Ok.quoted
quoted
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt index ed614383af9c..f17e2a5207dc 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt@@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ Optional Subnode: that can be used for CAN/CAN-FD modes. See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/can-transceiver.txt for details. + +- xceiver-supply: Regulator that powers the CAN transceiver.The supply for a transceiver should go in the transceiver node.Marc, while I have you here, do you agree with this?
I'll look into the details later today. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |