Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] pwm: Add support for Azoteq IQS620A PWM generator
From: Jeff LaBundy <hidden>
Date: 2020-01-22 03:56:21
Also in:
linux-iio, linux-input, linux-pwm
Hi Uwe,
quoted
However, you bring up a really interesting point about preserving what may have been done by the bootloader. The device holds itself in POR until its supply reaches a sufficient level, so there isn't necessarily a functional reason to manually issue a soft reset from the parent MFD driver. I could get rid of the manual soft reset, and then simply sync both out_en and duty_val in iqs620_pwm_probe which would allow iqs620_pwm_get_state to pick up any changes made by the bootloader prior to the kernel coming up.That sounds good. This way the PWM driver is independent of the MFD driver and does the right thing no matter if parent resets the chip or not.
Agreed on all counts.
quoted
The only problem is that leds-pwm disables the pwm at start-up, so the end result is the same anyway. Regardless of the behavior of any one consumer, however, I'm slightly inclined to go with the second option as it seems to be less restrictive and more maintainable. Let me know if you disagree.With default-state = "keep"; in your dt the LED shouldn't get disabled.
I see default-state defined as a common LED property, but leds-pwm doesn't seem to use it unfortunately. Looking through its code, brightness is just initialized to zero unconditionally. This doesn't change what is the right thing to do, nor do I imagine it to be a problem for typical use cases, just noting for completeness (however if I am mistaken please let me know).
Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Kind regards, Jeff LaBundy