Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 3 authors, 2019-08-18

Re: [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: clock: Add Bitmain BM1880 SoC clock controller binding

From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <hidden>
Date: 2019-08-17 03:34:39
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk, lkml

Hi Stephen,

On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 10:01:28PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2019-07-05 08:14:36)
quoted
Add devicetree binding for Bitmain BM1880 SoC clock controller.

Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <redacted>
---
 .../bindings/clock/bitmain,bm1880-clk.txt     | 47 +++++++++++
Can you convert this to YAML? It's all the rage right now.
Sure.
quoted
 include/dt-bindings/clock/bm1880-clock.h      | 82 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 129 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/bitmain,bm1880-clk.txt
 create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/bm1880-clock.h
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/bitmain,bm1880-clk.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/bitmain,bm1880-clk.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9c967095d430
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/bitmain,bm1880-clk.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+* Bitmain BM1880 Clock Controller
+
+The Bitmain BM1880 clock controler generates and supplies clock to
+various peripherals within the SoC.
+
+Required Properties:
+
+- compatible: Should be "bitmain,bm1880-clk"
+- reg :        Register address and size of PLL and SYS control domains
+- reg-names : Register domain names: "pll" and "sys"
+- clocks : Phandle of the input reference clock.
+- #clock-cells: Should be 1.
+
+Each clock is assigned an identifier, and client nodes can use this identifier
+to specify the clock which they consume.
+
+All available clocks are defined as preprocessor macros in corresponding
+dt-bindings/clock/bm1880-clock.h header and can be used in device tree sources.
+
+External clocks:
+
+The osc clock used as the input for the plls is generated outside the SoC.
+It is expected that it is defined using standard clock bindings as "osc".
+
+Example: 
+
+        clk: clock-controller@800 {
+                compatible = "bitmain,bm1880-clk";
+                reg = <0xe8 0x0c>,<0x800 0xb0>;
It looks weird still. What hardware module is this actually part of?
Some larger power manager block?
These are all part of the sysctrl block (clock + pinctrl + reset) and the
register domains got split between system and pll.

Thanks,
Mani
quoted
+                reg-names = "pll", "sys";
+                clocks = <&osc>;
+                #clock-cells = <1>;
+        };
+
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help