Thread (66 messages) 66 messages, 6 authors, 2018-10-06

Re: Re: [PATCH 13/27] drm/sun4i: Add support for H6 DE3 mixer 0

From: Jernej Škrabec <hidden>
Date: 2018-09-23 19:40:09
Also in: dri-devel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk, lkml

Dne sobota, 22. september 2018 ob 15:47:03 CEST je Chen-Yu Tsai napisal(a):
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 9:23 PM Chen-Yu Tsai [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 3:27 PM Jernej Skrabec [off-list ref] 
wrote:
quoted
quoted
Mixer 0 has 1 VI and 3 UI planes, scaler on all planes and can output
4K image @60Hz. It also support 10 bit colors.
AFAICT 10 bit color support is not implemented? Please mention this.
ok.
quoted
quoted
Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <redacted>
---

 drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.c index a9218abf0935..54eca2dd4b33
100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun8i_mixer.c
@@ -540,6 +540,15 @@ static int sun8i_mixer_remove(struct
platform_device *pdev)> > 
        return 0;
 
 }

+static const struct sun8i_mixer_cfg sun50i_h6_mixer0_cfg = {
Please sort the per-compatible structures according to "version sort"
rules.> 
quoted
+       .ccsc           = 0,
+       .is_de3         = true,
+       .mod_rate       = 600000000,
+       .scaler_mask    = 0xf,
+       .ui_num         = 3,
+       .vi_num         = 1,
+};
+

 static const struct sun8i_mixer_cfg sun8i_a83t_mixer0_cfg = {
 
        .ccsc           = 0,
        .scaler_mask    = 0xf,
@@ -587,6 +596,10 @@ static const struct sun8i_mixer_cfg
sun8i_v3s_mixer_cfg = {> > 
 };
 
 static const struct of_device_id sun8i_mixer_of_table[] = {

+       {
+               .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h6-de3-mixer-0",
+               .data = &sun50i_h6_mixer0_cfg,
+       },
Same here.

ChenYu
BTW, DE 3.0 includes a register in DE TOP called "DE IP configure register",
which gives the number of IP blocks per class, per mixer. If we retrieve
the configuration from this register, then we shouldn't need to
differentiate between mixer-0 and mixer-1 with compatible strings.

What do you think?
IIRC, not all setting were correct when read from registers, but I would need 
to check again. I'm also not sure if register holds all possible settings, so 
it is safer to have separate list. We would also have to devise mechanism to 
get this data from DE2/3 CCU driver (it occupies the same memory space).

Perhaps the strongest argument is that some SoCs with DE3 have HW bug in 
mixer1 block, including that in H6. In order to work, mod clock has to be 
enabled for mixer0 and mixer1 at the same time. I would associate that quirk 
with mixer1 compatible.

Best regards,
Jernej
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help