于 2018年9月12日 GMT+08:00 下午10:49:12, Chen-Yu Tsai [off-list ref] 写到:

On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 4:44 PM Icenowy Zheng [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

于 2018年9月4日 GMT+08:00 下午4:40:56, Chen-Yu Tsai [off-list ref] 写到:

quoted

On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 3:27 PM Jernej Skrabec

[off-list ref]

quoted

quoted

wrote:

quoted

From: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>

As we have already binding for the H6 system controller, add its

node

quoted

quoted

quoted

to the device tree.

Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
[fixed compatible string]
Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <redacted>

Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <redacted>

By the way can these patches be applied first? (patches
related to syscon).

They're also needed for EMAC.

Applied.

BTW, the H6 system control EMAC register also has the internal PHY
related controls seen on H3/H5. IIRC you previously mentioned that
they have no effect?

Yes, because the "internal PHY" on H6 is on AC200.

The internal/external mux bit has effect (although it will mux
to a non-existent PHY when switching to "internal", render
EMAC not usable), but it also has effect on A64 (same effect
with H6), on which it's not documented.

ChenYu

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel