Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 4 authors, 2018-09-18

Re: [PATCH V1 2/3] Documentation: sdhci-msm: Add entries for passing load values

From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date: 2018-07-25 17:55:26
Also in: linux-arm-msm, linux-mmc, lkml

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 04:16:05PM +0530, Vijay Viswanath wrote:
The load a particular sdhc controller should request from a regulator
is device specific and hence each device should individually vote for
the required load.
"dt-bindings: mmc: ..." for the subject.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Vijay Viswanath <redacted>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt
index 502b3b8..ee34f28 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.txt
@@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ Required properties:
 	"cal"	- reference clock for RCLK delay calibration (optional)
 	"sleep"	- sleep clock for RCLK delay calibration (optional)
 
+Optional properties:
+- <supply>-current-level - specifies load levels for supply during BUS_ON
+			and BUS_OFF states in power irq. Should be specified in
+			pairs (lpm, hpm), for BUS_OFF and BUS_ON respectively.
+			Units uA.
This should probably be a common regulator property (or maybe one exists 
already).

It is missing vendor prefix and unit suffix as-is.

Rob
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help