Thread (25 messages) 25 messages, 5 authors, 2018-03-28

Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] dt-bindings: phy-qcom-qmp: Update bindings for sdm845

From: Manu Gautam <hidden>
Date: 2018-03-28 07:26:28
Also in: linux-arm-msm, lkml

Hi,


On 3/28/2018 3:07 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:11 PM, Manu Gautam [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Update compatible strings for USB3 PHYs on SDM845.
One is QMPv3 DisplayPort-USB combo PHY and other one
is USB UNI PHY which is single lane USB3 PHY without
DP capability.

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Manu Gautam <redacted>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-qmp-phy.txt | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-qmp-phy.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-qmp-phy.txt
index dcf1b8f..cef8765 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-qmp-phy.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-qmp-phy.txt
@@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ Required properties:
               "qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy" for PCIe phy on IPQ8074
               "qcom,msm8996-qmp-pcie-phy" for 14nm PCIe phy on msm8996,
               "qcom,msm8996-qmp-usb3-phy" for 14nm USB3 phy on msm8996,
-              "qcom,qmp-v3-usb3-phy" for USB3 QMP V3 phy.
+              "qcom,qmp-v3-usb3-phy" for USB3 QMP V3 phy,
+              "qcom,sdm845-qmp-usb3-phy" for USB3 QMP V3 phy on sdm845,
+              "qcom,sdm845-qmp-usb3-uni-phy" for USB3 QMP V3 UNI phy on sdm845.
I'm confused.  What value does "qcom,qmp-v3-usb3-phy" have as a
separate entry from "qcom,sdm845-qmp-usb3-phy"?  Is
"qcom,qmp-v3-usb3-phy" expected to work on some non-SDM845 based
device?

Personally I think you should remove "qcom,qmp-v3-usb3-phy" from the
bindings as part of this patch (replacing it with the new string
qcom,sdm845-qmp-usb3-phy)".  Yeah, yeah bindings are forever.  ...but
that particular string was added about a month ago and (I believe) it
was intended for SDM845 anyway.  As per
<https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10302759/> match to the exact same
PHY data which leads extra credence to my belief.

If later on you find that some future chip can use the exact same
driver / settings as the SDM845 you can always list the
"qcom,sdm845-qmp-usb3-phy" string as a secondary compatible anyway.
I agree. Will just remove "qcom,sdm845-qmp-usb3-phy"
-Doug
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help