Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] phy: qcom-qmp: Enable pipe_clk before checking USB3 PHY_STATUS
From: Manu Gautam <hidden>
Date: 2018-03-27 05:07:18
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, lkml
Hi Doug, On 3/27/2018 9:56 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Manu On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:11 PM, Manu Gautam [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
QMP PHY for USB mode requires pipe_clk for calibration and PLL lock to take place. This clock is output from PHY to GCC clock_ctl and then fed back to QMP PHY and is available from PHY only after PHY is reset and initialized, hence it can't be enabled too early in initialization sequence. Signed-off-by: Manu Gautam <redacted> --- drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)So it's now new with this patch, but it's more obvious with this patch. It seems like "UFS/PCIE" is kinda broken w/ respect to how it controls its clock. Specifically: * If you init the PHY but don't power it on, then you "exit" the PHY: you'll disable/unprepare "pipe_clk" even though you never prepare/enabled it. * If you init the PHY, power it on, power it off, power it on, and exit the PHY: you'll leave the clock prepared one extra time. Specifically I'd expect: for UFS/PCIE the disable/unprepare should be symmetric with the enable/prepare and should be in "power off", not in exit. ...or did I miss something? Interestingly, your patch fixes this problem for USB3 (where init/exit are now symmetric), but leaves the problem there for UFS/PCIE.
Thanks for review. One of the reason why pipe_clk is disabled as part of phy_exit is that halt_check from clk_disable reports error if called after PHY has been powered down or phy_exit. I believe that warning should be ignored in qcom gcc-clock driver (for applicable platforms) by using BRANCH_HALT_DELAY as halt_check for pipe_clk and performing clk_disable from power_off for UFS/PCIE. I can implement that as separate patch once dependent gcc driver patch(es) gets in. Would that be ok? -Manu -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project