Thread (25 messages) 25 messages, 5 authors, 2018-03-28

Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] phy: qcom-qmp: Enable pipe_clk before checking USB3 PHY_STATUS

From: Manu Gautam <hidden>
Date: 2018-03-27 05:07:18
Also in: linux-arm-msm, lkml

Hi Doug,


On 3/27/2018 9:56 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Manu

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:11 PM, Manu Gautam [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
QMP PHY for USB mode requires pipe_clk for calibration and PLL lock
to take place. This clock is output from PHY to GCC clock_ctl and then
fed back to QMP PHY and is available from PHY only after PHY is reset
and initialized, hence it can't be enabled too early in initialization
sequence.

Signed-off-by: Manu Gautam <redacted>
---
 drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
So it's now new with this patch, but it's more obvious with this
patch.  It seems like "UFS/PCIE" is kinda broken w/ respect to how it
controls its clock.  Specifically:

* If you init the PHY but don't power it on, then you "exit" the PHY:
you'll disable/unprepare "pipe_clk" even though you never
prepare/enabled it.

* If you init the PHY, power it on, power it off, power it on, and
exit the PHY: you'll leave the clock prepared one extra time.

Specifically I'd expect: for UFS/PCIE the disable/unprepare should be
symmetric with the enable/prepare and should be in "power off", not in
exit.

...or did I miss something?


Interestingly, your patch fixes this problem for USB3 (where init/exit
are now symmetric), but leaves the problem there for UFS/PCIE.
Thanks for review.
One of the reason why pipe_clk is disabled as part of phy_exit is that
halt_check from clk_disable reports error if called after PHY has been
powered down or phy_exit.
I believe that warning should be ignored in qcom gcc-clock driver
(for applicable platforms) by using BRANCH_HALT_DELAY as halt_check
for pipe_clk and performing clk_disable from power_off for UFS/PCIE.

I can implement that as separate patch once dependent gcc driver
patch(es) gets in. Would that be ok?

-Manu

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help