Hi,
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:58:26AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:39:55PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
quoted
+Required property:
+ - compatible: Should be one of:
+ "ti,lm3532-backlight"
+ "ti,lm3631-backlight"
+ "ti,lm3632-backlight"
+ "ti,lm3633-backlight"
+ "ti,lm3695-backlight"
+ "ti,lm3697-backlight"
Some of the parts only do backlight, so drop the "-backlight" on those.
And having a sub-node makes no sense in that case. Perhaps it should be
2 binding documents separating the single function devices and MFDs. The
binding doc(s) doesn't have to align with the driver(s). You can have 1
driver serve 2 bindings.
Yes, there is LM3532 and LM3695, which is backlight only as far as I
can see. Your suggestion contradicts with existing binding, though:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti-lmu.txt
-- Sebastian