From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcochran@gmail.com]
Sent: 4 czerwca 2017 22:55
To: Rafal Ozieblo <redacted>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>; nicolas.ferre@atmel.com;
netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
harini.katakam@xilinx.com; andrei.pistirica@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] net: macb: Add hardware PTP support
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 03:28:10PM +0100, Rafal Ozieblo wrote:
quoted
+int gem_get_hwtst(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *rq)
+{
+ struct macb *bp = netdev_priv(dev);
+ struct hwtstamp_config *tstamp_config = &bp->tstamp_config;
+
+ if ((bp->hw_dma_cap & HW_DMA_CAP_PTP) == 0)
+ return -EFAULT;
Segmentation fault? Really?
...
quoted
+int gem_set_hwtst(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd)
+{
+ struct macb *bp = netdev_priv(dev);
+ struct hwtstamp_config *tstamp_config = &bp->tstamp_config;
+ enum macb_bd_control tx_bd_control = TSTAMP_DISABLED;
+ enum macb_bd_control rx_bd_control = TSTAMP_DISABLED;
+ u32 regval;
+
+ if ((bp->hw_dma_cap & HW_DMA_CAP_PTP) == 0)
+ return -EFAULT;
here again
Would "ENOTSUP" be sufficient ?
Thanks,
Richard
Regards,
Rafal