Re: [RFC PATCH 01/11] dt-bindings: update the binding for Allwinner H3 TVE support
From: Icenowy Zheng <hidden>
Date: 2017-05-19 18:08:07
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk, lkml
于 2017年5月20日 GMT+08:00 上午2:02:15, Maxime Ripard [off-list ref] 写到:
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:43:44AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:quoted
-On SoCs other than the A33 and V3s, there is one more clockrequired:quoted
+For the following compatibles: + * allwinner,sun5i-a13-tcon + * allwinner,sun6i-a31-tcon + * allwinner,sun6i-a31s-tcon + * allwinner,sun8i-a33-tcon + * allwinner,sun8i-v3s-tcon +there is one more clock and one more property required: + - clocks: + - 'tcon-ch0': The clock driving the TCON channel 0 + - clock-output-names: Name of the pixel clock created + +For the following compatibles: + * allwinner,sun5i-a13-tcon + * allwinner,sun6i-a31-tcon + * allwinner,sun6i-a31s-tcon + * allwinner,sun8i-h3-tcon0 +there is one more clock required: - 'tcon-ch1': The clock driving the TCON channel 1Putting ID's in the compatible name is usually a bad idea. What is the difference between the two? Only that the second one doesn't have a clock?
Yes.
That seems highly unlikely. How does it generate the pixel clock frequency?
Yes it seems impossible, but it's also the fact. There's only one CLK_TCON in H3/5, which is for TCON0. It's possible that lcd-ch1 clk is CLK_TVE, but it's still a weird situation -- Although we have a lcd-ch1 clock, we cannot touch it, otherwise the TVE will refuse to work (the TVE can only work under 216MHz).
Maxime
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.