Thread (47 messages) 47 messages, 4 authors, 2017-06-07

Re: [RFC PATCH 01/11] dt-bindings: update the binding for Allwinner H3 TVE support

From: Maxime Ripard <hidden>
Date: 2017-05-19 18:04:19
Also in: dri-devel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-clk, lkml

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:43:44AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
-On SoCs other than the A33 and V3s, there is one more clock required:
+For the following compatibles:
+   * allwinner,sun5i-a13-tcon
+   * allwinner,sun6i-a31-tcon
+   * allwinner,sun6i-a31s-tcon
+   * allwinner,sun8i-a33-tcon
+   * allwinner,sun8i-v3s-tcon
+there is one more clock and one more property required:
+ - clocks:
+   - 'tcon-ch0': The clock driving the TCON channel 0
+ - clock-output-names: Name of the pixel clock created
+
+For the following compatibles:
+   * allwinner,sun5i-a13-tcon
+   * allwinner,sun6i-a31-tcon
+   * allwinner,sun6i-a31s-tcon
+   * allwinner,sun8i-h3-tcon0
+there is one more clock required:
    - 'tcon-ch1': The clock driving the TCON channel 1
Putting ID's in the compatible name is usually a bad idea. What is the
difference between the two? Only that the second one doesn't have a
clock?

That seems highly unlikely. How does it generate the pixel clock
frequency?

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help