On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 7:01 PM, jmondi [off-list ref] wrote:

On Sun, May 07, 2017 at 09:52:49AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Andy Shevchenko
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Linus, for me it looks like better to revert that change, until we
will have clear picture why existing configuration parameters can't
work.

Yeah I'll revert the binding for fixes.

As it seems we won't be able to proceed with the currently proposed solution,
would that be acceptable now that we use the "pinmux" property to add
flags as BIDIR

Can you explain what does this *electrically* mean?
Second question, what makes it differ to what already exists?

 and SWIO_[INPUT|OUTPUT] directly there?

Ditto.

This was my original proposal, rejected because we were using the "pins"
property at the time.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko